Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25325699›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2014

Energy landscapes of functional proteins are inherently risky.

Anne Gershenson, Lila M Gierasch, Annalisa Pastore, Sheena E Radford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing Stability in Dynamic Small-Molecule Binding Proteins.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Membrane Charge Drives the Aggregation of TDP-43 Pathological Fragments.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Heterogeneous folding landscapes and predetermined breaking points within a protein family.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Protein quality control ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Class-specific interactions between Sis1 J-domain protein and Hsp70 chaperone potentiate disaggregation of misfolded proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. An enzyme-based biosensor for monitoring and engineering protein stability in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. How do Chaperones Bind (Partly) Unfolded Client Proteins?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne GershensonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Lila M Gierasch1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Annalisa PastoreDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus, London, UK.
Sheena E RadfordAstbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

PEPTIDE CONFORMATIONS &INTERACTIONS WITH MEMBRANESR01GM027616 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI GIERASCH, LILA M · 1985 to 2015
$5.3M
ACTIVATION OF PI-SPECIFIC PHOSPHOLIPASE C ENZYMESR01GM060418 · NIGMS · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI ROBERTS, MARY FEDARKO · 2000 to 2013
$3.1M
Modeling a cellular protein homeostasis networkR01GM101644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI GIERASCH, LILA M, POWERS, EVAN THOMAS · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
Post-Reductionist Protein Folding: Determining the In-cell Folding Energy LandscaR01GM094848 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI GERSHENSON, ANNE, GIERASCH, LILA M · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
European Research Council 322408Medical Research Council MC_PC_13054Medical Research Council MC_U117584256Medical Research Council U117584256NIGMS NIH HHS GM027616NIGMS NIH HHS GM060418NIGMS NIH HHS GM094848NIGMS NIH HHS GM101644NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM027616NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060418NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094848NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101644Wellcome Trust 092896Wellcome Trust WT092896MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary pressure for protein function leads to unavoidable sampling of conformational states that are at risk of misfolding and aggregation. The resulting tension between functional requirements and the risk of misfolding and/or aggregation in the evolution of proteins is becoming more and more apparent. One outcome of this tension is sensitivity to mutation, in which only subtle changes in sequence that may be functionally advantageous can tip the delicate balance toward protein aggregation. Similarly, increasing the concentration of aggregation-prone species by reducing the ability to control protein levels or compromising protein folding capacity engenders increased risk of aggregation and disease. In this Perspective, we describe examples that epitomize the tension between protein functional energy landscapes and aggregation risk. Each case illustrates how the energy landscapes for the at-risk proteins are sculpted to enable them to perform their functions and how the risks of aggregation are minimized under cellular conditions using a variety of compensatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

HumansModels, MolecularProtein Aggregation, PathologicalProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID25325699
PMCPMC4416114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.