Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25325468›Full record

ArticleSleep2015

The nature of stable insomnia phenotypes.

Vivek Pillai, Thomas Roth, Christopher L Drake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Sleep Continuity, Stability and Cyclic Organization Are Impaired in Insomniacs: A Case-Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The 103,200-arm acceleration dataset in the UK Biobank revealed a landscape of human sleep phenotypes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vivek PillaiSleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Thomas RothSleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Christopher L DrakeSleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI.

Funding

Longitudinal Study of Predisoposition and Life Events in Triggering InsomniaR01MH082785 · NIMH · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI DRAKE, CHRISTOPHER L · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesWe examined the 1-y stability of four insomnia symptom profiles: sleep onset insomnia; sleep maintenance insomnia; combined onset and maintenance insomnia; and neither criterion (i.e., insomnia cases that do not meet quantitative thresholds for onset or maintenance problems). Insomnia cases that exhibited the same symptom profile over a 1-y period were considered to be phenotypes, and were compared in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics.

designLongitudinal.

settingUrban, community-based.

participantsNine hundred fifty-four adults with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition based current insomnia (46.6 ± 12.6 y; 69.4% female).

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsAt baseline, participants were divided into four symptom profile groups based on quantitative criteria. Follow-up assessment 1 y later revealed that approximately 60% of participants retained the same symptom profile, and were hence judged to be phenotypes. Stability varied significantly by phenotype, such that sleep onset insomnia (SOI) was the least stable (42%), whereas combined insomnia (CI) was the most stable (69%). Baseline symptom groups (cross-sectionally defined) differed significantly across various clinical indices, including daytime impairment, depression, and anxiety. Importantly, however, a comparison of stable phenotypes (longitudinally defined) did not reveal any differences in impairment or comorbid psychopathology. Another interesting finding was that whereas all other insomnia phenotypes showed evidence of an elevated wake drive both at night and during the day, the 'neither criterion' phenotype did not; this latter phenotype exhibited significantly higher daytime sleepiness despite subthreshold onset and maintenance difficulties.

conclusionsBy adopting a stringent, stability-based definition, this study offers timely and important data on the longitudinal trajectory of specific insomnia phenotypes. With the exception of daytime sleepiness, few clinical differences are apparent across stable phenotypes.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAdultAnxietyComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyDepressionDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSleep StagesTime Factorsinsomnianonrestorative sleepphenotypeprospectivesleep maintenancesleep onset

Identifiers

PMID25325468
PMCPMC4262945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.