Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25325055›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2014

Impact of Amorphous SiO2 Nanoparticles on a Living Organism: Morphological, Behavioral, and Molecular Biology Implications.

Alfredo Ambrosone, Maria Rosaria Scotto di Vettimo, Maria Ada Malvindi, Modi Roopin, Oren Levy, Valentina Marchesano, Pier Paolo Pompa, Claudia Tortiglione, Angela Tino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sensitivity ofToxics · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Carbon Nano-Onions onNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfredo AmbrosoneIstituto di Cibernetica "Eduardo Caianiello", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pozzuoli , Italy.
Maria Rosaria Scotto di VettimoIstituto di Cibernetica "Eduardo Caianiello", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pozzuoli , Italy.
Maria Ada MalvindiCenter for Biomolecular Nanotechnologies@UNILE, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia , Arnesano , Italy.
Modi RoopinThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University , Ramat Gan , Israel.
Oren LevyThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University , Ramat Gan , Israel.
Valentina MarchesanoIstituto di Cibernetica "Eduardo Caianiello", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pozzuoli , Italy.
Pier Paolo PompaCenter for Biomolecular Nanotechnologies@UNILE, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia , Arnesano , Italy.
Claudia TortiglioneIstituto di Cibernetica "Eduardo Caianiello", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pozzuoli , Italy.
Angela TinoIstituto di Cibernetica "Eduardo Caianiello", Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pozzuoli , Italy.
Istituto di Cibernetica “Eduardo Caianiello” · ITBar-Ilan University · ILItalian Institute of Technology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally accepted that silica (SiO2) is not toxic. But the increasing use of silica nanoparticles (SiO2NPs) in many different industrial fields has prompted the careful investigation of their toxicity in biological systems. In this report, we describe the effects elicited by SiO2NPs on animal and cell physiology. Stable and monodisperse amorphous silica nanoparticles, 25 nM in diameter, were administered to living Hydra vulgaris (Cnidaria). The dose-related effects were defined by morphological and behavioral assays. The results revealed an all-or-nothing lethal toxicity with a rather high threshold (35 nM NPs) and a LT50 of 38 h. At sub lethal doses, the morphophysiological effects included: animal morphology alterations, paralysis of the gastric region, disorganization and depletion of tentacle specialized cells, increase of apoptotic and collapsed cells, and reduction of the epithelial cell proliferation rate. Transcriptome analysis (RNAseq) revealed 45 differentially expressed genes, mostly involved in stress response and cuticle renovation. Our results show that Hydra reacts to SiO2NPs, is able to rebalance the animal homeostasis up to a relatively high doses of SiO2NPs, and that the physiological modifications are transduced to gene expression modulation.

Indexed as

amorphous silica nanoparticlesextracellular matrix homeostasisGSH responseHydrananotoxicityRNAseq

Identifiers

PMID25325055
PMCPMC4179610
OpenAlexW2080632614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.