Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25324730›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2014

Mouse vision as a gateway for understanding how experience shapes neural circuits.

Nicholas J Priebe, Aaron W McGee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Richness of Vision in the Mammalian Brain: Neural Codes for Visual Perception and Behavior in Three Dimensions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. GABAergic Projections from the Pretectum Boost Retinogeniculate Signal Transfer via Disinhibition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Widespread and Multifaceted Binocular Integration in the Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Visuomotor control in mice and primates.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas J PriebeSection of Neurobiology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Aaron W McGeeDevelopmental Neuroscience Program, Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Deciphering Inhibition of Visual Plasticity by NgR1R01EY021580 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI MCGEE, AARON W · 2012 to 2020
$3.1M
Excitation and inhibition in visual processingR01EY025102 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRIEBE, NICHOLAS J · 2014 to 2023
$3.1M
Cortical Integration of Binocular InputR01EY019288 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRIEBE, NICHOLAS J · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019288NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021580NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic programs controlling ontogeny drive many of the essential connectivity patterns within the brain. Yet it is activity, derived from the experience of interacting with the world, that sculpts the precise circuitry of the central nervous system. Such experience-dependent plasticity has been observed throughout the brain but has been most extensively studied in the neocortex. A prime example of this refinement of neural circuitry is found in primary visual cortex (V1), where functional connectivity changes have been observed both during development and in adulthood. The mouse visual system has become a predominant model for investigating the principles that underlie experience-dependent plasticity, given the general conservation of visual neural circuitry across mammals as well as the powerful tools and techniques recently developed for use in rodent. The genetic tractability of mice has permitted the identification of signaling pathways that translate experience-driven activity patterns into changes in circuitry. Further, the accessibility of visual cortex has allowed neural activity to be manipulated with optogenetics and observed with genetically-encoded calcium sensors. Consequently, mouse visual cortex has become one of the dominant platforms to study experience-dependent plasticity.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMiceNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsOptogeneticsVision, OcularVisual CortexVisual Pathwaysbinocularitydevelopmentinhibitionocular dominance plasticityvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID25324730
PMCPMC4183107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.