ArticleYonago acta medica2014
Effectiveness of the LigaSure Small Jaw Vessel-Sealing System in Hepatic Resection.
Article in Yonago acta medica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced bipolar vessel sealing devices vs conventional bipolar energy in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Pooled it
- Surgery.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2023Article
- Article
- A randomized controlled study comparing a vessel sealing system with the conventional technique in axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn hepatic resection for liver tumors, reducing operation time and blood loss are important for postsurgical complication prevention. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the LigaSure Small Jaw (Covidien, Boulder, CO) with those of the Cavitation Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) system (Integra Life Sciences, Plainsboro, NJ) in hepatic surgery.
methodsWe enrolled 102 patients with liver tumors, of whom 51 underwent liver resection with the CUSA (CUSA group) between March 2004 and April 2011. Another 51 underwent resection with the LigaSure Small Jaw (LS group) between June 2011 and July 2012. We stratified patients by time period depending on the instrument used, and compared operative duration; intraoperative bleeding; and postoperative liver function and complication rate.
resultsTotal operation time (mean ± SD) was significantly shorter in the LS group than in the CUSA group (358.8 ± 91.7 versus 460.6 ± 146.1 min, P < 0.001). Blood loss was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Frequency of postoperative complications was lower, but not significantly, in the LS group.
conclusionThe LigaSure Small Jaw may allow a shorter total operative duration than the CUSA device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25324590PMC4198575W2135759798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.