Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25324490›Full record

ReviewEvolution, medicine, and public health2014

Malignant cancer and invasive placentation: A case for positive pleiotropy between endometrial and malignancy phenotypes.

Alaric W D'Souza, Günter P Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stromal resistance to placental invasion is a derived trait in ruminants.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  8. Placenta: an old organ with new functions.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tracing the cis-regulatory changes underlying the endometrial control of placental invasion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alaric W D'SouzaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Günter P WagnerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA gunter.wagner@yale.edu.
Wayne State University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer metastasis is an invasive process that involves the transplantation of cells into new environments. Since human placentation is also invasive, hypotheses about a relationship between invasive placentation in eutherian mammals and metastasis have been proposed. The relationship between metastatic cancer and invasive placentation is usually presented in terms of antagonistic pleiotropy. According to this hypothesis, evolution of invasive placentation also established the mechanisms for cancer metastasis. Here, in contrast, we argue that the secondary evolution of less invasive placentation in some mammalian lineages may have resulted in positive pleiotropic effects on cancer survival by lowering malignancy rates. These positive pleiotropic effects would manifest themselves as resistance to cancer cell invasion. To provide a preliminary test of this proposal, we re-analyze data from Priester and Mantel (Occurrence of tumors in domestic animals. Data from 12 United States and Canadian colleges of veterinary medicine. J Natl Cancer Inst 1971; 47: :1333-44) about malignancy rates in cows, horses, cats and dogs. From our analysis we found that equines and bovines, animals with less invasive placentation, have lower rates of metastatic cancer than felines and canines in skin and glandular epithelial cancers as well as connective tissue sarcomas. We conclude that a link between type of placentation and species-specific malignancy rates is more likely related to derived mechanisms that suppress invasion rather than different degrees of fetal placental aggressiveness.

Indexed as

antagonistic pleiotropycancerevolution of malignancyevolution of placentation

Identifiers

PMID25324490
PMCPMC4217742
OpenAlexW2111143878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.