Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25324123›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2014

Atypical MHC class II-expressing antigen-presenting cells: can anything replace a dendritic cell?

Taku Kambayashi, Terri M Laufer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 273 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 483 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taku KambayashiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Terri M LauferPhiladelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Proximal signaling complexes in NK cell effector function and developmentR01HL107589 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KAMBAYASHI, TAKU · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells are regarded as the classical antigen-presenting cells of the immune system. However, in recent years, there has been a rapid increase in the number of cell types that are suggested to present antigens on MHC class II molecules to CD4(+) T cells. In this Review, we describe the key characteristics that define an antigen-presenting cell by examining the functions of dendritic cells. We then examine the functions of the haematopoietic cells and non-haematopoietic cells that can express MHC class II molecules and that have been suggested to represent 'atypical' antigen-presenting cells. We consider whether any of these cell populations can prime naive CD4(+) T cells and, if not, question the effects that they do have on the development of immune responses.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationBasophilsB-LymphocytesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesDendritic CellsEosinophilsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHumansImmunoglobulin EMacrophagesMast CellsNeutrophilsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

PMID25324123
OpenAlexW2124904564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.