Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25323556›Full record

ReviewThe FEBS journal2014

Eaten to death.

Charles Nelson, Eric H Baehrecke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The FEBS journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autophagy in Drosophila and Zebrafish.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charles NelsonDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Eric H Baehrecke
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Genetic Regulation of Autophagic Cell DeathR01GM079431 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BAEHRECKE, ERIC H · 2007 to 2019
$4.4M
Interplay between the Endocrine and Innate Systems of DrosphilaR01AI099708 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BAEHRECKE, ERIC H, SILVERMAN, NEAL · 2012 to 2023
$4.2M
Function of Atg6 and autophagy in growth controlR01CA159314 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BAEHRECKE, ERIC H · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA159314NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159314NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI099708NIGMS NIH HHS GM079431NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macro-autophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) delivers cytoplasmic material to the lysosome for degradation, and has been implicated in many cellular processes, including stress, infection, survival and death. Although the regulation and role of autophagy in stress, infection and survival is apparent, its involvement during cell death remains relatively unclear. In this review, we highlight what is known about the role that autophagy can play during physiological cell death, and discuss the implications of better understanding cellular destruction that involves autophagy.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsArabidopsisCell DeathDictyosteliumDrosophila melanogasterVertebratesapoptosisATG genesautophagycell deathnecrosis

Identifiers

PMID25323556
PMCPMC4262626
OpenAlexW2009794442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.