Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2015
Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study.
Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cornea Donor Study: The Effect of Donor Age on Penetrating Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disease
Pathogenetic Risk Factors for Corneal Graft Rejection in Penetrating Keratoplasty Patients
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss 3 Years After Successful Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Cornea Preservation Time Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA ophthalmology · 2017Trial
- Long-Term Graft Survival Following Penetrating Keratoplasty in Eyes with Preoperative Corneal Neovascularization.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Ten-year outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Hong Kong: a retrospective cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Preoperative and perioperative factors that predict graft failure 1 year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.PloS one · 2026Article
- A novel single-cell level evaluation method for corneal endothelial cell function.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of recipient and donor factors on corneal graft clearance: insights from serial anterior segment optical coherence tomography.AJO international · 2025Article
- Validation of a Deep Learning-Assisted Evaluation of Total Corneal Endothelial Cells Viability.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Incidence of Corneal Graft Failure with Glaucoma Drainage Device Placement in the Anterior Chamber Compared to the Ciliary Sulcus.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- A Review of Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Interventions in Patients with Pre-Existing Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Correlation between preoperative aqueous cytokine levels and mid-term corneal endothelial cell loss following penetrating keratoplasty.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of corneal transplantation: a review of 8,378 patients.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- The donation-transplantation process and corneal graft failure: A case-control study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Deep learning based highly accurate transplanted bioengineered corneal equivalent thickness measurement using optical coherence tomography.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- A Predictive Model for Graft Failure in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty Among Chinese Patients: A 2-Year Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Medical and economic impacts of managing corneas from older donors at the tissue bank-a single-center retrospective study spanning over 12 years.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Preoperative surgeon evaluation of corneal endothelial status: the Viability Control of Human Endothelial Cells before Keratoplasty (V-CHECK) study protocol.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- The Biologic Character of Donor Corneal Endothelial Cells Influences Endothelial Cell Density Post Successful Corneal Transplantation.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Impact of pandemic COVID-19 lockdown on penetrating keratoplasty patients.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: analysis of clinical outcomes of patients with 8-10 years follow-up.International ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe Cornea Donor Study (CDS) showed that donor age is not a factor in survival of most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease. Secondary analyses confirm the importance of surgical indication and presence of glaucoma in outcomes at 10 years.
objectiveTo assess the relationship between donor and recipient factors and corneal graft survival in the CDS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsMulticenter prospective, double-masked, controlled clinical trial conducted at 80 clinical sites. One hundred five surgeons enrolled 1090 participants undergoing corneal transplant for a moderate-risk condition, principally Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE). Forty-three eye banks provided corneas.
interventionsCorneas from donors younger than 66 years and donors 66 years or older were assigned, masked to donor age. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. Participants were followed up for as long as 12 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Graft failure, defined as a regrafting procedure or a cloudy cornea for 3 consecutive months.
resultsThe 10-year cumulative probability of graft failure was higher in participants with PACE than in those with Fuchs dystrophy (37% vs 20%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.1 [99% CI, 1.4-3.0]; P < .001) and in participants with a history of glaucoma before penetrating keratoplasty, particularly with prior glaucoma surgery (58% with prior glaucoma surgery and use of medications to lower intraocular pressure at the time of surgery vs 22% with no history of glaucoma surgery or medication use; HR, 4.1 [99% CI, 2.2-7.5]; P < .001). We found trends toward increased graft failure in recipients who were 70 years or older compared with those younger than 60 years (29% vs 19%; HR, 1.2 [99% CI, 0.7-2.1]; P = .04) or were African American (HR, 1.5; P = .11) or who had a history of smoking (35% vs 24%; HR, 1.6 [99% CI, 0.9-2.8]; P = .02). Lower endothelial cell density (ECD) and higher corneal thickness (CT) at 6 months (6% vs 41% for ECD ≥2700 vs <1700 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 14% vs 36% for CT <500 vs ≥600 μm [P = .001]), 1 year (4% vs 39% for ECD ≥2700 vs <1700 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 18% vs 28% for CT <500 vs ≥600 μm [P = .04]), and 5 years (2% vs 29% for ECD ≥1500 vs <500 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 7% vs 34% for CT <550 vs ≥650 μm [P < .001]) were associated with subsequent graft failure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most penetrating corneal grafts for Fuchs dystrophy or PACE remain clear at 10 years. The risk for failure is greater for graft recipients with PACE and those with a history of glaucoma. Measurements of ECD and CT during the course of postkeratoplasty follow-up are associated with a risk for failure. However, even with very low ECD and high CT at 5 years, most corneas remain clear at 10 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.