Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25322173›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2015

Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study.

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group, Alan Sugar, Robin L Gal, Craig Kollman, Dan Raghinaru, Mariya Dontchev, Christopher R Croasdale, Robert S Feder, Edward J Holland, Jonathan H Lass and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00006411 nacompletednot on this map

Cornea Donor Study: The Effect of Donor Age on Penetrating Keratoplasty for Endothelial Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Eye Institute (NEI)Ran2000 to 2014Enrolled1,090ConditionsCorneal Disease, Fuch's Dystrophy, Pseudophakic Corneal EdemaArmscorneas assigned by donor age group
NCT06281587 completednot on this map

Pathogenetic Risk Factors for Corneal Graft Rejection in Penetrating Keratoplasty Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorThe S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery State InstitutionRan2011 to 2019Enrolled93ConditionsGraft RejectionArmspenetrating keratoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group
Alan SugarW. K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Robin L GalJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Craig KollmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Dan RaghinaruJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Mariya DontchevJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Christopher R CroasdaleDavis Duehr Dean Clinic, Madison, Wisconsin.
Robert S FederDepartment of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Edward J HollandCincinnati Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Jonathan H LassUniversity Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jonathan I MacyMacy Eye Center, Los Angeles, California.
Mark J MannisEye Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Patricia W SmithTriangle Eye Physicians, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Sarkis H SoukiasianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

CORNEAL DONOR STUDYU10EY012358 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI BECK, ROY W. · 1999 to 2012
$8.5M
CORNEAL DONOR STUDY--SPECULAR MICROSCOPY ANCILLARY STUDYU10EY012728 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LASS, JONATHAN H · 1999 to 2003
$359k
NEI NIH HHS EY12358NEI NIH HHS EY12728NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012358NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe Cornea Donor Study (CDS) showed that donor age is not a factor in survival of most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease. Secondary analyses confirm the importance of surgical indication and presence of glaucoma in outcomes at 10 years.

objectiveTo assess the relationship between donor and recipient factors and corneal graft survival in the CDS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsMulticenter prospective, double-masked, controlled clinical trial conducted at 80 clinical sites. One hundred five surgeons enrolled 1090 participants undergoing corneal transplant for a moderate-risk condition, principally Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE). Forty-three eye banks provided corneas.

interventionsCorneas from donors younger than 66 years and donors 66 years or older were assigned, masked to donor age. Surgery and postoperative care were performed according to the surgeons' usual routines. Participants were followed up for as long as 12 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Graft failure, defined as a regrafting procedure or a cloudy cornea for 3 consecutive months.

resultsThe 10-year cumulative probability of graft failure was higher in participants with PACE than in those with Fuchs dystrophy (37% vs 20%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.1 [99% CI, 1.4-3.0]; P < .001) and in participants with a history of glaucoma before penetrating keratoplasty, particularly with prior glaucoma surgery (58% with prior glaucoma surgery and use of medications to lower intraocular pressure at the time of surgery vs 22% with no history of glaucoma surgery or medication use; HR, 4.1 [99% CI, 2.2-7.5]; P < .001). We found trends toward increased graft failure in recipients who were 70 years or older compared with those younger than 60 years (29% vs 19%; HR, 1.2 [99% CI, 0.7-2.1]; P = .04) or were African American (HR, 1.5; P = .11) or who had a history of smoking (35% vs 24%; HR, 1.6 [99% CI, 0.9-2.8]; P = .02). Lower endothelial cell density (ECD) and higher corneal thickness (CT) at 6 months (6% vs 41% for ECD ≥2700 vs <1700 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 14% vs 36% for CT <500 vs ≥600 μm [P = .001]), 1 year (4% vs 39% for ECD ≥2700 vs <1700 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 18% vs 28% for CT <500 vs ≥600 μm [P = .04]), and 5 years (2% vs 29% for ECD ≥1500 vs <500 cells/mm2 [P < .001]; 7% vs 34% for CT <550 vs ≥650 μm [P < .001]) were associated with subsequent graft failure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most penetrating corneal grafts for Fuchs dystrophy or PACE remain clear at 10 years. The risk for failure is greater for graft recipients with PACE and those with a history of glaucoma. Measurements of ECD and CT during the course of postkeratoplasty follow-up are associated with a risk for failure. However, even with very low ECD and high CT at 5 years, most corneas remain clear at 10 years.

Indexed as

CorneaKeratoplasty, PenetratingTissue DonorsAgedAge FactorsCell CountCorneal EdemaCorneal Endothelial Cell LossDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, CornealEye BanksFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGlaucomaGraft Rejection

Identifiers

PMID25322173
PMCPMC4394864
OpenAlexW2017496262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.