Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25321872›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2014

A method for estimating urban background concentrations in support of hybrid air pollution modeling for environmental health studies.

Saravanan Arunachalam, Alejandro Valencia, Yasuyuki Akita, Marc L Serre, Mohammad Omary, Valerie Garcia, Vlad Isakov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Finely Resolved On-Road PMRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Air quality modeling in support of the Near-Road Exposures and Effects of Urban Air Pollutants Study (NEXUS).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saravanan ArunachalamInstitute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Europa Drive, Suite 490, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, USA. sarav@email.unc.edu.
Alejandro ValenciaInstitute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Europa Drive, Suite 490, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, USA. valenal@email.unc.edu.
Yasuyuki AkitaDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Michael Hooker Research Center, 1305 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. akita@email.unc.edu.
Marc L SerreDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Michael Hooker Research Center, 1305 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. marc_serre@unc.edu.
Mohammad OmaryInstitute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Europa Drive, Suite 490, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, USA. omary@email.unc.edu.
Valerie GarciaNational Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Garcia.Val@epa.gov.
Vlad IsakovNational Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA. Isakov.Vlad@epa.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure studies rely on detailed characterization of air quality, either from sparsely located routine ambient monitors or from central monitoring sites that may lack spatial representativeness. Alternatively, some studies use models of various complexities to characterize local-scale air quality, but often with poor representation of background concentrations. A hybrid approach that addresses this drawback combines a regional-scale model to provide background concentrations and a local-scale model to assess impacts of local sources. However, this approach may double-count sources in the study regions. To address these limitations, we carefully define the background concentration as the concentration that would be measured if local sources were not present, and to estimate these background concentrations we developed a novel technique that combines space-time ordinary kriging (STOK) of observations with outputs from a detailed chemistry-transport model with local sources zeroed out. We applied this technique to support an exposure study in Detroit, Michigan, for several pollutants (including NOx and PM2.5), and evaluated the estimated hybrid concentrations (calculated by combining the background estimates that addresses this issue of double counting with local-scale dispersion model estimates) using observations. Our results demonstrate the strength of this approach specifically by eliminating the problem of double-counting reported in previous hybrid modeling approaches leading to improved estimates of background concentrations, and further highlight the relative importance of NOx vs. PM2.5 in their relative contributions to total concentrations. While a key limitation of this approach is the requirement for another detailed model simulation to avoid double-counting, STOK improves the overall characterization of background concentrations at very fine spatial scales.

Indexed as

Spatio-Temporal AnalysisAir PollutantsAir PollutionEnvironmental MonitoringMichiganModels, StatisticalNitrogen OxidesParticulate MatterUrban HealthAir PollutantsNitrogen OxidesParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID25321872
PMCPMC4210993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.