Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25321634›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2014

Measurement of compliance with New York City's regulations on beverages, physical activity, and screen time in early child care centers.

Laura Lessard, Catherine Lesesne, Jakub Kakietek, Andrew Breck, Jan Jernigan, Lillian Dunn, Cathy Nonas, Sarah Abood O'Dell, Robert L Stephens, Ye Xu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Implementation Adherence and Perspectives of the Childcare PhysicaL ActivitY (PLAY) Policy: A Process Evaluation.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura LessardArcadia University, 450 S Easton Rd, Glenside, PA 19038. Telephone: 215-517-2597. E-mail: LessardL@Arcadia.edu.
Catherine LesesneICF International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jakub KakietekICF International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Andrew BreckNational Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jan JerniganCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lillian DunnNew York City Department of Education, New York, New York.
Cathy NonasNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York.
Sarah Abood O'DellICF International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robert L StephensICF International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ye XuICF International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Laura Kettel KhanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPolicy interventions designed to change the nutrition environment and increase physical activity in child care centers are becoming more common, but an understanding of the implementation of these interventions is yet to be developed. The objective of this study was to explore the extent and consistency of compliance with a policy intervention designed to promote nutrition and physical activity among licensed child care centers in New York City.

methodsWe used a multimethod cross-sectional approach and 2 independent components of data collection (Center Evaluation Component and Classroom Evaluation Component). The methods were designed to evaluate the impact of regulations on beverages served, physical activity, and screen time at child care centers. We calculated compliance scores for each evaluation component and each regulation and percentage agreement between compliance in the center and classroom components.

resultsCompliance with certain requirements of the beverage regulations was high and fairly consistent between components, whereas compliance with the physical activity regulation varied according to the data collection component. Compliance with the regulation on amount and content of screen time was high and consistent.

conclusionCompliance with the physical activity regulation may be a more fluid, day-to-day issue, whereas compliance with the regulations on beverages and television viewing may be easier to control at the center level. Multiple indicators over multiple time points may provide a more complete picture of compliance - especially in the assessment of compliance with physical activity policies.

Indexed as

BeveragesChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMotor ActivityChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolFood ServicesHumansNew York CityNutrition PolicyPediatric Obesity

Identifiers

PMID25321634
PMCPMC4208992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.