Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25321415›Full record

ArticleMolecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)2014

Research Resource: STR DNA profile and gene expression comparisons of human BG-1 cells and a BG-1/MCF-7 clonal variant.

Yin Li, Yukitomo Arao, Julie M Hall, Sandra Burkett, Liwen Liu, Kevin Gerrish, Vincent Cavailles, Kenneth S Korach

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DifferentialEnvironmental health perspectives · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yin LiLaboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology (Y.L., Y.A., K.S.K.) and Molecular Genomics Core Facility (L.L., K.G.), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709; College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (J.M.H.), Campbell University, Buies Creek, North Carolina 27506; Center for Cancer Research (S.B.), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland 21702; and Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (V.C.), Institut de Recherche en Cancerologie de Montpellier and INSERM Unité 896, Universite Montpellier1, F-34298 Montpellier, France.
Yukitomo Arao
Julie M Hall
Sandra Burkett
Liwen Liu
Kevin Gerrish
Vincent Cavailles
Kenneth S Korach
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USNational Institutes of Health · USCampbell University · USCenter for Cancer Research · USInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FR

Funding

Gene Expression and MicroarraysZICES102445 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GERRISH, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$31.6M
Chemical Receptor Interactions In Reproduction And Hormonal ToxicityZIAES070065 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KORACH, KENNETH S · 2009 to 2019
$29.6M
Chemical Receptor Interactions Reproduction/HormonalZ01ES070065 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KORACH, KENNETH S · 1985 to 2008
$5.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES070065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human ovarian cancer BG-1 cells are a valuable in vitro model that has enabled several laboratories to study the estrogenic responses of ovarian cancers. We recently discovered that there are two different BG-1 cell lines being used for experiments, denoted here as BG-1 FR and BG-1 NIEHS, which exhibit striking morphological differences. The objective of this study was to methodically analyze these two BG-1 variants and compare their characteristics. Short tandem repeat analysis revealed that the DNA profile of BG-1 FR cells was unique, yet the Short tandem repeat pattern of BG-1 NIEHS was identical with that of MCF-7 cells. From a cytogenetic analysis, it became apparent that the BG-1 FR line had the same profile as previously reported, whereas the BG-1 NIEHS and MCF-7 cells share a similar genetic display. A significant number of unique chromosomal translocations were observed between the BG-1 NIEHS and MCF-7 cells, suggesting that acquired genotypic differences resulted in the formation of two lines from a common origin. Although all cell types demonstrated a similar estrogen responsiveness in reporter gene assays, a microarray analysis revealed distinct estrogen-responsive gene expression patterns with surprisingly moderate to low overlap. We conclude that BG-1 FR is the original ovarian cancer cell line, whereas the BG-1 NIEHS is a variant from the MCF-7 cells. These findings provide much needed clarification of the identities and characteristics of key cell line models that are widely used to study estrogen action in female reproductive cancers.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDNAFemaleGenotypeHumansOvarian NeoplasmsReceptors, EstrogenTranslocation, GeneticDNAReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID25321415
PMCPMC4250366
OpenAlexW1975893629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.