Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25321159›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine communications2015

Image-derived input function with factor analysis and a-priori information.

Urban Simončič, Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Towards quantitative [18F]FDG-PET/MRI of the brain: Automated MR-driven calculation of an image-derived input function for the non-invasive determination of cerebral glucose metabolic rates.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Article
  4. Image-derived input function estimation on a TOF-enabled PET/MR for cerebral blood flow mapping.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Urban SimončičaJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana bThe Centre of Excellence for Biosensors, Instrumentation and Process Control - COBIK, Ajdovščina, Slovenia cUniversity of Bordeaux, CNRS, INCIA, UMR 5287, Talence, France dMolecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara

Funding

Clinical Evaluation of PET RadiotracersZIAMH002852 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI INNIS, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$48.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative PET studies often require the cumbersome and invasive procedure of arterial cannulation to measure the input function. This study sought to minimize the number of necessary blood samples by developing a factor-analysis-based image-derived input function (IDIF) methodology for dynamic PET brain studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsIDIF estimation was performed as follows: (a) carotid and background regions were segmented manually on an early PET time frame; (b) blood-weighted and tissue-weighted time-activity curves (TACs) were extracted with factor analysis; (c) factor analysis results were denoised and scaled using the voxels with the highest blood signal; (d) using population data and one blood sample at 40 min, whole-blood TAC was estimated from postprocessed factor analysis results; and (e) the parent concentration was finally estimated by correcting the whole-blood curve with measured radiometabolite concentrations. The methodology was tested using data from 10 healthy individuals imaged with [(11)C](R)-rolipram. The accuracy of IDIFs was assessed against full arterial sampling by comparing the area under the curve of the input functions and by calculating the total distribution volume (VT).

resultsThe shape of the image-derived whole-blood TAC matched the reference arterial curves well, and the whole-blood area under the curves were accurately estimated (mean error 1.0±4.3%). The relative Logan-V(T) error was -4.1±6.4%. Compartmental modeling and spectral analysis gave less accurate V(T) results compared with Logan.

conclusionA factor-analysis-based IDIF for [(11)C](R)-rolipram brain PET studies that relies on a single blood sample and population data can be used for accurate quantification of Logan-V(T) values.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveArteriesBrainCarbon RadioisotopesFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKineticsPositron-Emission TomographyRolipramCarbon RadioisotopesRolipram

Identifiers

PMID25321159
PMCPMC4270921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.