Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25321082›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2015

Sugar-sweetened beverages, vascular risk factors and events: a systematic literature review.

Amelie Keller, Berit L Heitmann, Nanna Olsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Amelie Keller1Research Unit for Dietary Studies,Institute of Preventive Medicine,Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals,Nordre Fasanvej 57,Hovedvejen,2000 Frederiksberg,Denmark.
Berit L Heitmann1Research Unit for Dietary Studies,Institute of Preventive Medicine,Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals,Nordre Fasanvej 57,Hovedvejen,2000 Frederiksberg,Denmark.
Nanna Olsen1Research Unit for Dietary Studies,Institute of Preventive Medicine,Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals,Nordre Fasanvej 57,Hovedvejen,2000 Frederiksberg,Denmark.
Frederiksberg Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA high intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) has been linked to weight gain, obesity and type 2 diabetes; however, the influence on CVD risk remains unclear. Therefore, our objective was to summarize current evidence for an association between SSB consumption and cardiovascular risk factors and events.

designThe article search was performed in August 2013. Two independent researchers performed the article search and selection, data extraction and quality assessment. Eligible studies reported the intake of SSB and one of the following outcomes: change in blood pressure, blood lipid or blood sugar, or CVD events such as stroke or myocardial infarction. Only intervention and longitudinal studies were included. SUBJECTS: Only studies in adults (aged 18+ years old) were considered.

resultsTwo of four prospective studies found clear direct associations between SSB consumption and CHD, while two of three studies, including both men and women, found direct associations between SSB consumption and stroke; however, the association was significant among women only. All included studies examining vascular risk factors found direct associations between SSB consumption and change in blood pressure, blood lipid or blood sugar.

conclusionsThe reviewed studies generally showed that SSB intake was related to vascular risk factors, whereas associations with vascular events were less consistent. Due to a limited number of published papers, especially regarding vascular events, the strength of the evidence is still limited and hence more studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineAdultBeveragesCoronary DiseaseDietary SucroseFemaleHigh Fructose Corn SyrupHumansHyperglycemiaHyperlipidemiasHypertensionIncidenceMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsStrokeDietary SucroseHigh Fructose Corn SyrupReview

Identifiers

PMID25321082
PMCPMC10271571
OpenAlexW2047666058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.