Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25320813›Full record

Trial reportMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2014

Deep learning based imaging data completion for improved brain disease diagnosis.

Rongjian Li, Wenlu Zhang, Heung-Il Suk, Li Wang, Jiang Li, Dinggang Shen, Shuiwang Ji

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Advancing Alzheimer's research: A review of big data promises.International journal of medical informatics · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Turning brain MRI into diagnostic PET:Medical image analysis · 2024
    Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rongjian Li
Wenlu Zhang
Heung-Il Suk
Li Wang
Jiang Li
Dinggang Shen
Shuiwang Ji

Funding

Longitudinal Mapping of Human Brain Development in the First Years of LifeR01EB008374 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YAP, PEW-THIAN · 2009 to 2024
$5.1M
Development of Robust Brain Measurement Tools Informed by Ultrahigh Field 7T MRIR01EB006733 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YAP, PEW-THIAN · 2008 to 2020
$4.5M
Quantifying Brain Abnormality by Multimodality Neuroimage Analysis,R01AG041721 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, MINGXIA · 2012 to 2019
$3.0M
Infant Brain Measurement and Super-Resolution Atlas ConstructionR01MH100217 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEN, DINGGANG · 2013 to 2016
$2.3M
Assessing Large-scale Brain Connectivities in Mild Cognitive ImpairmentR01AG042599 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI LIU, TIANMING · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
Fast, Robust Analysis of Large Population DataR01EB009634 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEN, DINGGANG · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041721NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042599NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006733NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008374NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009634NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining multi-modality brain data for disease diagnosis commonly leads to improved performance. A challenge in using multimodality data is that the data are commonly incomplete; namely, some modality might be missing for some subjects. In this work, we proposed a deep learning based framework for estimating multi-modality imaging data. Our method takes the form of convolutional neural networks, where the input and output are two volumetric modalities. The network contains a large number of trainable parameters that capture the relationship between input and output modalities. When trained on subjects with all modalities, the network can estimate the output modality given the input modality. We evaluated our method on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, where the input and output modalities are MRI and PET images, respectively. Results showed that our method significantly outperformed prior methods.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedPositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25320813
PMCPMC4464771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.