ArticleBreeding science2014
Development of EST-SSR markers and construction of a linkage map in faba bean (Vicia faba).
Article in Breeding science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Faba bean genetic loci associated with quantitative resistance to the fungusFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of Gene-Based SSR Markers in the GenusScientifica · 2023Article
- Article
- Genetic and Transcriptome Analysis of Leaf Trichome Development in Chinese Cabbage (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Genome features of common vetch (Plant direct · 2021Article
- Recent advances in faba bean genetic and genomic tools for crop improvement.Legume science · 2021Review
- Developing a new genic SSR primer database in faba bean (Vicia faba L.).Journal of applied genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- A SNP-based consensus genetic map for synteny-based trait targeting in faba bean (Vicia faba L.).Plant biotechnology journal · 2016Article
- Advances in Faba Bean Genetics and Genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2016Review
- Development and Identification of SSR Markers Associated with Starch Properties and β-Carotene Content in the Storage Root of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L.).Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- De novo assembly of a genome-wide transcriptome map of Vicia faba (L.) for transfer cell research.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a high density linkage map in faba bean, a total of 1,363 FBES (Faba bean expressed sequence tag [EST]-derived simple sequence repeat [SSR]) markers were designed based on 5,090 non-redundant ESTs developed in this study. A total of 109 plants of a 'Nubaria 2' × 'Misr 3' F2 mapping population were used for map construction. Because the parents were not pure homozygous lines, the 109 F2 plants were divided into three subpopulations according to the original F1 plants. Linkage groups (LGs) generated in each subpopulation were integrated by commonly mapped markers. The integrated 'Nubaria 2' × 'Misr 3' map consisted of six LGs, representing a total length of 684.7 cM, with 552 loci. Of the mapped loci, 47% were generated from multi-loci diagnostic (MLD) markers. Alignment of homologous sequence pairs along each linkage group revealed obvious syntenic relationships between LGs in faba bean and the genomes of two model legumes, Lotus japonicus and Medicago truncatula. In a polymorphic analysis with ten Egyptian faba bean varieties, 78.9% (384/487) of the FBES markers showed polymorphisms. Along with the EST-SSR markers, the dense map developed in this study is expected to accelerate marker assisted breeding in faba bean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.