Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25320350›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2014

Time course of the rabbit's conditioned nictitating membrane movements during acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition.

E James Kehoe, Elliot A Ludvig, Richard S Sutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E James KehoeSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia j.kehoe@unsw.edu.au ejameskehoe@gmail.com.
Elliot A LudvigDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Richard S SuttonDepartment of Computing Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present experiment tested whether or not the time course of a conditioned eyeblink response, particularly its duration, would expand and contract, as the magnitude of the conditioned response (CR) changed massively during acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition. The CR duration remained largely constant throughout the experiment, while CR onset and peak time occurred slightly later during extinction. The results suggest that computational models can account for these results by using two layers of plasticity conforming to the sequence of synapses in the cerebellar pathways that mediate eyeblink conditioning.

Indexed as

BlinkingAnimalsConditioning, EyelidExtinction, PsychologicalLearningMotor ActivityNictitating MembraneRabbitsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25320350
PMCPMC4201810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.