Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25319759›Full record

ReviewBriefings in functional genomics2015

Evolving insights on how cytosine methylation affects protein-DNA binding.

Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Tianyin Zhou, Satyanarayan Rao, Pragya Goel, Chaitanya Rastogi, Allan Lazarovici, Harmen J Bussemaker, Remo Rohs

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in functional genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fatty Acid Induced Hypermethylation in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Carolina Dantas Machado
Tianyin Zhou
Satyanarayan Rao
Pragya Goel
Chaitanya Rastogi
Allan Lazarovici
Harmen J Bussemaker
Remo Rohs
University of Southern California · USSouthern California University for Professional Studies · US

Funding

Nation Center: Multi-Scale Study- Cellular Networks(RMI)U54CA121852 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2005 to 2015
$37.4M
Inferring regulatory circuitry from microarray dataR01HG003008 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI BUSSEMAKER, HARMEN J · 2004 to 2020
$7.0M
Multi-scale modeling of genetic variation in a developmental networkU01GM103804 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DEPACE, ANGELA H, MARJORAM, PAUL · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Training Program in Computational BiologyT32GM082797 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HONIG, BARRY H · 2008 to 2015
$1.4M
Genome analysis based on the integration of DNA sequence and shapeR01GM106056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ROHS, REMO · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54CA121852NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003008NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG003008NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106056NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM106056NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM082797NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM103804NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM103804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many anecdotal observations exist of a regulatory effect of DNA methylation on gene expression. However, in general, the underlying mechanisms of this effect are poorly understood. In this review, we summarize what is currently known about how this important, but mysterious, epigenetic mark impacts cellular functions. Cytosine methylation can abrogate or enhance interactions with DNA-binding proteins, or it may have no effect, depending on the context. Despite being only a small chemical change, the addition of a methyl group to cytosine can affect base readout via hydrophobic contacts in the major groove and shape readout via electrostatic contacts in the minor groove. We discuss the recent discovery that CpG methylation increases DNase I cleavage at adjacent positions by an order of magnitude through altering the local 3D DNA shape and the possible implications of this structural insight for understanding the methylation sensitivity of transcription factors (TFs). Additionally, 5-methylcytosines change the stability of nucleosomes and, thus, affect the local chromatin structure and access of TFs to genomic DNA. Given these complexities, it seems unlikely that the influence of DNA methylation on protein-DNA binding can be captured in a small set of general rules. Hence, data-driven approaches may be essential to gain a better understanding of these mechanisms.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAnimalsBase SequenceCytosineHumansModels, MolecularNucleosomesProtein BindingTranscription FactorsCytosineNucleosomesTranscription Factors5-methylcytosineDNA methylationDNase I endonucleaseepigeneticsprotein–DNA interactionstranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID25319759
PMCPMC4303714
OpenAlexW2163964975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.