Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25319747›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2014

Parental experiences of providing skin-to-skin care to their newborn infant--part 2: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson, Zeni C Lamy, Maria Tingvall, Mats Eriksson

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Kangaroo care by fathers and mothers: comparison of physiological and stress responses in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Agneta Anderzén-CarlssonCentre for Health Care Sciences, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; agneta.anderzen-karlsson@orebroll.se.
Zeni C LamyDepartamento de Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Hospital Universitário, Sao Luis, Brazil.
Maria TingvallDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Mats ErikssonCentre for Health Care Sciences, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Bezmialem Foundation University Medical Faculty Hospital · TRHospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRÖrebro University · SEÖrebro University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo synthesize and interpret qualitative research findings focusing on parental experiences of skin-to-skin care (SSC) for newborn infants.

backgroundSSC induces many benefits for newborn infants and their parents. Three meta-analyses have been conducted on physiological outcomes, but no previous qualitative meta-synthesis on parental experiences of SSC has been identified.

designThe present meta-synthesis was guided by the methodology described by Paterson and co-workers. DATA SOURCES: Four databases were searched, without year or language limitations, up until December 2013. Manual searches were also performed. The searches and subsequent quality appraisal resulted in the inclusion of 29 original qualitative papers from 9 countries, reporting experiences from 401 mothers and 94 fathers. REVIEW

methodsThe meta-synthesis entails a meta-data analysis, analysis of meta-method, and meta-theory in the included primary studies. Based on the three analyses, the meta-synthesis represents a new interpretation of a phenomenon. The results of the meta-data analysis have been presented as a qualitative systematic review in a separate paper.

resultsWhen synthesizing and interpreting the findings from the included analyses, a theoretical model of Becoming a parent under unfamiliar circumstances emerged. Providing SSC seems to be a restorative as well as an energy-draining experience. A supportive environment has been described as facilitating the restorative experience, whereas obstacles in the environment seem to make the provision of SSC energy-draining for parents. When the process is experienced as positive, it facilitates the growth of parental self-esteem and makes the parents ready to assume full responsibility for their child.

conclusionThe results show that SSC can be interpreted not only as a family-including and important health care intervention but also in terms of actually becoming a parent. The process of becoming a parent in this specific situation is influenced by external factors in three different levels; family and friends, community, and society at large. The descriptions of providing SSC are similar to what has previously been described as the natural process of becoming a mother or a father.

Indexed as

Kangaroo-Mother Care MethodObject AttachmentParentsTouchHumansInfant, NewbornMother-Child RelationsQualitative ResearchKangaroo mother caremeta-studymeta-synthesisnewborn infantqualitative researchskin-to-skin care

Identifiers

PMID25319747
PMCPMC4197398
OpenAlexW1974388949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.