Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25319689›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Selective activation of ipsilateral motor pathways in intact humans.

Toshiki Tazoe, Monica A Perez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Exercise intensity affects acute neurotrophic and neurophysiological responses poststroke.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2019
    Trial
  4. Neural Substrates for Head Movements in Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  5. Acute Modulation of Lumbar Motor Unit Behavior During Experimentally Induced Low Back Pain: A Motor Unit Decomposition Analysis.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Does the reticulospinal tract mediate adaptation to resistance training in humans?Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Unexpected (Journal of neurology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshiki TazoeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261.
Monica A PerezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261 perezmo@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Neural Control of Bilateral Hand and Arm Movements After Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS076589 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2011 to 2016
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been proposed that ipsilateral motor pathways play a role in the control of ipsilateral movements and recovery of function after injury. However, the extent to which ipsilateral motor pathways are engaged in voluntary activity in intact humans remains largely unknown. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm representation of the primary motor cortex, we examined ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs) in a proximal arm muscle during increasing levels of unilateral and bilateral isometric force in a sitting position. We demonstrate that iMEP area and amplitude decreased during bilateral contraction of homonymous (elbow flexor) muscles and increased during bilateral contraction of heteronymous (elbow flexor and extensor) muscles compared with a unilateral contraction, regardless of the level of force tested. To further understand the neuronal inputs involved in the bilateral effects, we examined the contribution from neck afferents projecting onto ipsilateral motor pathways. Medial (away from the muscle tested) and lateral (toward the muscle tested) rotation of the head enhanced bilateral iMEP effects from homonymous and heteronymous muscles, respectively. In contrast, head flexion and extension exerted nonspecific bilateral effects on iMEPs. Intracortical inhibition, in the motor cortex where iMEPs originated, showed modulation compatible with the changes in iMEPs. We conclude that ipsilateral projections to proximal arm muscles can be selectively modulated by voluntary contraction of contralateral arm muscles, likely involving circuits mediating asymmetric tonic neck reflexes acting, at least in part, at the cortical level. The pattern of bilateral actions may represent a strategy to engage ipsilateral motor pathways in a motor behavior.

Indexed as

AdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultipsilateral pathwaysmotor recoveryprimary motor cortexspinal cord injurytranscallosal pathwaysvoluntary movement

Identifiers

PMID25319689
PMCPMC4198538
OpenAlexW2054025260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.