Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25319597›Full record

Trial reportGlobal health action2014

Domestic violence and mental health: a cross-sectional survey of women seeking help from domestic violence support services.

Giulia Ferrari, Roxane Agnew-Davies, Jayne Bailey, Louise Howard, Emma Howarth, Tim J Peters, Lynnmarie Sardinha, Gene Feder

RetractedAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Trial report in Global health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2016-02-08Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Retract and Replace · · Article is superseded by an article by the same title with the DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.29890
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giulia FerrariCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; giulia.ferrari@bristol.ac.uk.
Roxane Agnew-DaviesDomestic Violence Training Ltd, Surrey, UK.
Jayne BaileyCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Louise HowardInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Emma HowarthCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Tim J PetersCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lynnmarie SardinhaCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gene FederCentre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-011Department of Health PB-PG-0906-11026Department of Health RP-PG-0108-10084Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestic violence and abuse (DVA) are associated with an increased risk of mental illness, but we know little about the mental health of female DVA survivors seeking support from domestic violence services.

objectiveDomestic violence and abuse (DVA) are associated with an increased risk of mental illness, but we know little about the mental health of female DVA survivors seeking support from domestic violence services.

designBaseline data on 260 women enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention for DVA survivors was analyzed. We report prevalence of and associations between mental health status and severity of abuse at the time of recruitment. We used logistic and normal regression models for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Mental health measures used were: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), Patient Health Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment, and the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS) to measure posttraumatic stress disorder. The Composite Abuse Scale (CAS) measured abuse.

resultsExposure to DVA was high, with a mean CAS score of 56 (SD 34). The mean CORE-OM score was 18 (SD 8) with 76% above the clinical threshold (95% confidence interval: 70-81%). Depression and anxiety levels were high, with means close to clinical thresholds, and all respondents recorded PTSD scores above the clinical threshold. Symptoms of mental illness increased stepwise with increasing severity of DVA.

conclusionsExposure to DVA was high, with a mean CAS score of 56 (SD 34). The mean CORE-OM score was 18 (SD 8) with 76% above the clinical threshold (95% confidence interval: 70-81%). Depression and anxiety levels were high, with means close to clinical thresholds, and all respondents recorded PTSD scores above the clinical threshold. Symptoms of mental illness increased stepwise with increasing severity of DVA.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSocial SupportWomen's HealthAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk FactorsSurvivorsUnited KingdomadvocacyanxietyCORE-OMdepressiondomestic violence and abuseintimate partner violencemental healthposttraumatic stress disorderwomen

Identifiers

PMID25319597
PMCPMC4199331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.