Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25319497›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2014

A protocol for the delivery of cannabidiol (CBD) and combined CBD and ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by vaporisation.

Nadia Solowij, Samantha J Broyd, Hendrika H van Hell, Arno Hazekamp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acute effects of ΔPsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  2. A randomised controlled trial of vaporised ΔEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Carbonyl Compounds in Mainstream Smoke of Hemp Cigarettes.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cannabis and Driving.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A user's guide to cannabinoid therapies in oncology.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia SolowijSchool of Psychology, Ψ-P3: Centre for Psychophysics, Psychophysiology and Psychopharmacology and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. nadia@uow.edu.au.
Samantha J Broyd
Hendrika H van Hell
Arno Hazekamp
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute · AULeiden University · NLUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant interest has emerged in the therapeutic and interactive effects of different cannabinoids. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been shown to have anxiolytic and antipsychotic effects with high doses administered orally. We report a series of studies conducted to determine the vaporisation efficiency of high doses of CBD, alone and in combination with ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), to achieve faster onset effects in experimental and clinical trials and emulate smoked cannabis.

methodsPurified THC and CBD (40 mg/ml and 100 mg/ml respectively) were loaded onto a liquid absorbing pad in a Volcano vaporiser, vaporised and the vapours quantitatively analysed. Preliminary studies determined 200 mg CBD to be the highest dose effectively vaporised at 230 ° C, yielding an availability of approximately 40% in the vapour phase. Six confirmatory studies examined the quantity of each compound delivered when 200 mg or 4 mg CBD was loaded together with 8 mg of THC.

resultsTHC showed 55% availability when vaporised alone or with low dose CBD, while large variation in the availability of high dose CBD impacted upon the availability of THC when co-administered, with each compound affecting the vaporisation efficiency of the other in a dynamic and dose-dependent manner. We describe optimised protocols that enable delivery of 160 mg CBD through vaporisation.

conclusionsWhile THC administration by vaporisation is increasingly adopted in experimental studies, often with oral predosing with CBD to examine interactive effects, no studies to date have reported the administration of CBD by vaporisation. We report the detailed methodology aimed at optimising the efficiency of delivery of therapeutic doses of CBD, alone and in combination with THC, by vaporisation. These protocols provide a technical advance that may inform methodology for clinical trials in humans, especially for examining interactions between THC and CBD and for therapeutic applications of CBD.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN24109245.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationCannabidiolDronabinolHumansCannabidiolDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID25319497
PMCPMC4274767
OpenAlexW2090007272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.