Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25319212›Full record

Trial reportBiometrics2015

Bayesian nonparametric estimation of targeted agent effects on biomarker change to predict clinical outcome.

Rebecca Graziani, Michele Guindani, Peter F Thall

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biometrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Graphical Dirichlet Process for Clustering Non-Exchangeable Grouped Data.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A Common Atoms Model for the Bayesian Nonparametric Analysis of Nested Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca GrazianiUniversità Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan, Italy.
Michele GuindaniUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Peter F ThallUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Bocconi University · IT

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR COMPLEX CANCER TRIALSR01CA083932 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI THALL, PETER F · 2000 to 2017
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30-CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA083932NCI NIH HHS R01 CA83932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of a targeted agent on a cancer patient's clinical outcome putatively is mediated through the agent's effect on one or more early biological events. This is motivated by pre-clinical experiments with cells or animals that identify such events, represented by binary or quantitative biomarkers. When evaluating targeted agents in humans, central questions are whether the distribution of a targeted biomarker changes following treatment, the nature and magnitude of this change, and whether it is associated with clinical outcome. Major difficulties in estimating these effects are that a biomarker's distribution may be complex, vary substantially between patients, and have complicated relationships with clinical outcomes. We present a probabilistically coherent framework for modeling and estimation in this setting, including a hierarchical Bayesian nonparametric mixture model for biomarkers that we use to define a functional profile of pre-versus-post-treatment biomarker distribution change. The functional is similar to the receiver operating characteristic used in diagnostic testing. The hierarchical model yields clusters of individual patient biomarker profile functionals, and we use the profile as a covariate in a regression model for clinical outcome. The methodology is illustrated by analysis of a dataset from a clinical trial in prostate cancer using imatinib to target platelet-derived growth factor, with the clinical aim to improve progression-free survival time.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremData Interpretation, StatisticalAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersEpidemiologic MethodsHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersImatinib MesylateBayesian nonparametricsBiomarker profilesNested Dirichlet processReceiving operating curveSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID25319212
PMCPMC4383707
OpenAlexW2171128090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.