ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2015
Use of emotional cues for lexical learning: a comparison of autism spectrum disorder and fragile X syndrome.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence of spontaneous mentalizing in children with Cornelia de Lange and fragile X syndromes, but not autistic children.Oxford open neuroscience · 2025Article
- Social communication in fragile X syndrome: pilot examination of the Brief Observation of Social Communication Change (BOSCC).Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022Article
- A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ganaxolone in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2017Article
- Language Skills of Males with Fragile X Syndrome or Nonsyndromic Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2017Article
- Updated report on tools to measure outcomes of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study evaluated the ability of males with fragile X syndrome (FXS), nonsyndromic autism spectrum disorder (ASD), or typical development to learn new words by using as a cue to the intended referent an emotional reaction indicating a successful (excitement) or unsuccessful (disappointment) search for a novel object. Performance for all groups exceeded chance-levels in both search conditions. In the Successful Search condition, participants with nonsyndromic ASD performed similarly to participants with FXS after controlling for severity of ASD. In the Unsuccessful Search condition, participants with FXS performed significantly worse than participants with nonsyndromic ASD, after controlling for severity of ASD. Predictors of performance in both search conditions differed between the three groups. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.