ArticleDer Anaesthesist2014
[Question prompt list for premedication consultation : Patient-oriented information on anesthesia].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a Novel Question Prompt List in Pediatric Surgical Oncology.The Journal of surgical research · 2023Article
- Beyond Oncology: Question Prompt Lists in Healthcare-A Scoping Review Protocol.Methods and protocols · 2020Article
- No question too small: development of a question prompt list for parents of critically ill infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018Article
- [Relevance of preoperative anxiety for postoperative outcome in urological surgery patients: A prospective observational study].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe anesthesia premedication consultation is an obligatory procedure prior to any upcoming surgery. It is the anesthesiologist's responsibility to collect all necessary information regarding the patient's medical condition to decide on the appropriate narcosis and to ensure that the patient comprehends the anesthesia procedure and its effects.
aimInformation needs of patients regarding anesthesia are often not adequately fulfilled. This study was carried out to develop a structured questionnaire containing questions that patients may wish to ask the anesthesiologist (question prompt list anesthesiology QPL-A) to support information transfer from the anesthesiologist to the patient in the premedication consultation. The questionnaire should measure the information needs of the patient regarding different aspects of the anesthesia process with good psychometric qualities. MATERIAL AND
methodsBased on a literature review and interviews with experts a list of anesthesia-related questions was developed and distributed to patients receiving premedication consultation at the University Medical Center in Mainz, Germany (n = 202). In addition, patients were also asked to complete the state trait operation anxiety inventory (STOA).
resultsUsing principal component analysis and subsequent varimax rotation (declaration of total variance 68 %), four reliable information needs scales were extrapolated: (1) anesthesia procedure and effects (QPL-A-E, α = 0.92), (2) anesthesia safety (QPL-A-S, α = 0.86), (3) advice concerning preanesthesia behavior (QPL-A-B, α = 0.85) and (4) anesthetists actions (QPL-A-A, α = 0.79). In order to obtain sufficient information regarding the QPL-A-S, the procedure itself and its effects (QPL-A-E) were found to be of greatest importance for the patients and behavioral changes (QPL-A-B), e. g. stopping smoking, were judged to be less important by the patients. Women scored higher on the QPL-A-E (U-test p ≤ 0.001) and QPL-A-A (U-test p ≤ 0.05) than men. Elderly patients (≥ 70) showed significantly more interest in safety information (QPL-A-S) than younger patients (≤ 39, U-test p ≤ 0.05). All scales showed a significant positive correlation with STOA trait anxiety (r = 0.29-0.50) but only the QPL-A-E and the QPL-A-S scales were associated with STOA state anxiety (QPL-A-E: affective r = 30, cognitive r = 0.36, both p ≤ 0.001; QPL-A-S: affective r = 19, p ≤ 0.05, cognitive r = 0.23, p ≤ 0.01). Self-assessed knowledge on narcosis correlated only weakly with the QPL-A-E (r = 0.21 p ≤ 0.01) but not with the other information areas. Information needs were not associated with the education level of the patient, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and malignancy of the disease. Most of the participants (77 %) evaluated the QPL-A to be very or fairly helpful for the expression of their information needs.
conclusionThe QPL-A is a useful tool for meeting the subjective information needs of patients which could improve the patient orientation of the anesthesia premedication consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.