Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25318591›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2014

Ozone co-exposure modifies cardiac responses to fine and ultrafine ambient particulate matter in mice: concordance of electrocardiogram and mechanical responses.

Nicole Kurhanewicz, Rachel McIntosh-Kastrinsky, Haiyan Tong, Leon Walsh, Aimen K Farraj, Mehdi S Hazari

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiovascular adaptations to particle inhalation exposure: molecular mechanisms of the toxicology.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole KurhanewiczCurriculum in Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. nak@email.unc.edu.
Rachel McIntosh-KastrinskyDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. ramcinto@email.unc.edu.
Haiyan TongEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Chapel Hill, NC, 27711, USA. tong.haiyan@epa.gov.
Leon WalshEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Chapel Hill, NC, 27711, USA. walsh.leon@epa.gov.
Aimen K FarrajEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Chapel Hill, NC, 27711, USA. farraj.aimen@epa.gov.
Mehdi S HazariEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Chapel Hill, NC, 27711, USA. hazari.mehdi@epa.gov.
Environmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown a relationship between air pollution and increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Due to the complexity of ambient air pollution composition, recent studies have examined the effects of co-exposure, particularly particulate matter (PM) and gas, to determine whether pollutant interactions alter (e.g. synergistically, antagonistically) the health response. This study examines the independent effects of fine (FCAPs) and ultrafine (UFCAPs) concentrated ambient particles on cardiac function, and determine the impact of ozone (O₃) co-exposure on the response. We hypothesized that UFCAPs would cause greater decrement in mechanical function and electrical dysfunction than FCAPs, and that O₃ co-exposure would enhance the effects of both particle-types.

methodsConscious/unrestrained radiotelemetered mice were exposed once whole-body to either 190 μg/m³ FCAPs or 140 μg/m³ UFCAPs with/without 0.3 ppm O₃; separate groups were exposed to either filtered air (FA) or O₃ alone. Heart rate (HR) and electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded continuously before, during and after exposure, and cardiac mechanical function was assessed using a Langendorff perfusion preparation 24 hrs post-exposure.

resultsFCAPs alone caused a significant decrease in baseline left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and contractility, whereas UFCAPs did not; neither FCAPs nor UFCAPs alone caused any ECG changes. O₃ co-exposure with FCAPs caused a significant decrease in heart rate variability when compared to FA but also blocked the decrement in cardiac function. On the other hand, O₃ co-exposure with UFCAPs significantly increased QRS-interval, QTc and non-conducted P-wave arrhythmias, and decreased LVDP, rate of contractility and relaxation when compared to controls.

conclusionsThese data suggest that particle size and gaseous interactions may play a role in cardiac function decrements one day after exposure. Although FCAPs + O₃ only altered autonomic balance, UFCAPs + O₃ appeared to be more serious by increasing cardiac arrhythmias and causing mechanical decrements. As such, O₃ appears to interact differently with FCAPs and UFCAPs, resulting in varied cardiac changes, which suggests that the cardiovascular effects of particle-gas co-exposures are not simply additive or even generalizable. Additionally, the mode of toxicity underlying this effect may be subtle given none of the exposures described here impaired post-ischemia recovery.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacAtmosphere Exposure ChambersDrug SynergismElectrocardiographyFemaleHeartHeart RateInhalation ExposureMechanical PhenomenaMice, Inbred C57BLMyocardial ContractionOxidants, PhotochemicalOxidative StressOzoneAir PollutantsOxidants, PhotochemicalOzoneParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID25318591
PMCPMC4203862
OpenAlexW2104025531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.