Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25318446›Full record

ArticleNeurogenetics2015

A comprehensive clinical and genetic study of a large Mexican population with spinocerebellar ataxia type 7.

L Velázquez-Pérez, C M Cerecedo-Zapata, O Hernández-Hernández, E Martínez-Cruz, Y S Tapia-Guerrero, R González-Piña, J Salas-Vargas, R Rodríguez-Labrada, R Gurrola-Betancourth, N Leyva-García and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Tremor in Spinocerebellar Ataxia: A Scoping Review.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Molecular Targets and Therapeutic Strategies in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Velázquez-PérezLaboratory of Genomic Medicine, Department of Genetics, National Rehabilitation Institute (INR), Mexico City, Mexico.
C M Cerecedo-Zapata
O Hernández-Hernández
E Martínez-Cruz
Y S Tapia-Guerrero
R González-Piña
J Salas-Vargas
R Rodríguez-Labrada
R Gurrola-Betancourth
N Leyva-García
B Cisneros
J J Magaña
National Institute of Genomic Medicine · MXCenter for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia associated with macular degeneration. We recently described one of the largest series of patients with SCA7 that originated from a founder effect in a Mexican population, which allowed us to perform herein the first comprehensive clinical, neurophysiological, and genetic characterization of Mexican patients with SCA7. In this study, 50 patients, categorized into adult or early phenotype, were clinically assessed using standard neurological exams and genotyped using fluorescent PCR and capillary electrophoresis. Patients with SCA7 exhibited the classical phenotype of the disease characterized by cerebellar ataxia and visual loss; however, we reported, for the first time, frontal-executive disorders and altered sensory-motor peripheral neuropathy in these patients. Semiquantitative analysis of ataxia-associated symptoms was performed using Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) scores, while extracerebellar features were measured employing the Inventory of Non-ataxia Symptoms (INAS) scale. Ataxia rating scales confirmed the critical role size of cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeat size on age at onset and disease severity, while analysis of CAG repeat instability showed that paternal rather than maternal transmission led to greater instability.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSeverity of Illness IndexSpinocerebellar AtaxiasYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25318446
OpenAlexW2328831916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.