Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25318369›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2015

Endoscopic full-thickness resection and clip defect closure in the colon with the new FTRD system: experimental study.

Marc O Schurr, Franziska E Baur, Martina Krautwald, Marion Fehlker, Manfred Wehrmann, Thomas Gottwald, Ruediger L Prosst

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02362126 (Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection in the Lower GI Tract With the "Full Thickness Resection Device"- A Prospective Multicenter Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02362126 unknown statusnot on this map

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection in the Lower GI Tract With the "Full Thickness Resection Device"- A Prospective Multicenter Trial

TypeobservationalSponsorKliniken Ludwigsburg-Bietigheim gGmbHRan2015 to 2017Enrolled80ConditionsColorectal Adenomas, Submucosal TumorsArmsEndoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRDDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc O SchurrOvesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Franziska E Baur
Martina Krautwald
Marion Fehlker
Manfred Wehrmann
Thomas Gottwald
Ruediger L Prosst
Steinbeis University Berlin · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefit of endoscopic full-thickness resection is the improved diagnostic work-up with an integral wall specimen which allows a precise determination of the tumor or its precursor and its infiltration depth into the wall. MATERIALS AND

methodsA new endoscopic full-thickness resection device (FTRD), which is a combination of a modified over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) system with an electrocautery snare, has been tested in an experimental setting. In eleven pigs, divided into three groups, endoscopic full-thickness resection was performed in the colon at one or two sites, respectively. Seven days (n = 7) or 28 days (n = 4) after the intervention, the animals were euthanized following endoscopic examination of the resection and clip application sites. Furthermore, two different clips were tested during these animal trials in order to evaluate the most effective clip design.

resultsThe average diameter of the tissue resected with the FTRD was 3.1, 3.6, and 5.4 cm in the three groups. On follow-up endoscopy 7 days after the intervention, fibrin coating and stool residues were found at all clips, causing minor inflammatory reactions. However, the colon wall under the clip was non-inflamed. After 28 days, the serosa had primarily healed in all cases. There were also stool residues at all clips; however, no acute inflammatory reactions were seen anymore, due to complete healing. Histological assessment did not show any signs of dehiscence in the region of the scar, or ischemia in the clip area. In addition, no wound infections, such as abscess formation, were observed.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the clip-and-cut technique using the new FTRD system. With the device, a local full-thickness colon resection can be easily created, and the resulting wall defect is reliably sealed by the endoluminal application of a modified OTSC clip.

Indexed as

ElectrocoagulationAnimalsColectomyColonEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFeasibility StudiesModels, AnimalSwine

Identifiers

PMID25318369
OpenAlexW2313391223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.