Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25318353›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2014

Heparin therapy reduces 28-day mortality in adult severe sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Changsong Wang, Chunjie Chi, Lei Guo, Xiaoyang Wang, Libo Guo, Jiaxiao Sun, Bo Sun, Shanshan Liu, Xuenan Chang, Enyou Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04313790 (Assessment of the Anti-inflammatory Effect of Unfractionated Heparin Administered Either by Intravenous Infusion Versus Subcutaneous Injection in Critically Ill Septic Patients. A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04313790 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Anti-inflammatory Effect of Unfractionated Heparin Administered Either by Intravenous Infusion Versus Subcutaneous Injection in Critically Ill Septic Patients. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamanhour UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsSepsis, Critical IllnessArmsHeparin Infusion, subcutaneous heparin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Changsong Wang
Chunjie Chi
Lei Guo
Xiaoyang Wang
Libo Guo
Jiaxiao Sun
Bo Sun
Shanshan Liu
Xuenan Chang
Enyou Li
Harbin Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNTianjin Huanhu Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are approximately 19 million new cases of sepsis worldwide each year. Among them, more than one quarter of patients die. We aimed to assess the effects of heparin on short-term mortality in adult patients with sepsis and severe sepsis.

methodsWe searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases; the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) and conference proceedings (Web of Knowledge (Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science, Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Social Sciences & Humanities)) from inception to July 2014, expert contacts and relevant websites. Controlled trials of heparin versus placebo in sepsis or severe sepsis were identified. In total two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, and four authors independently extracted data; consensus was reached by conference. We used the chi-square test and I2 to assess statistical heterogeneity (P <0.05). The primary analysis was based on the fixed-effect model to produce pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsA total of nine publications were included in the meta-analysis. Heparin decreased 28-day mortality (n = 3,482, OR = 0.656, 95% CI = 0.562 to 0.765, P <0.0001). According to the meta-analysis of 28-day mortality, heterogeneity was not found among the eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (I2 = 0.0%). Heparin had no effect on bleeding events in sepsis (seven RCTs, n = 2,726; OR = 1.063; 95% CI = 0.834 to 1.355; P = 0.623; and I2 = 20.9%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the sample size may be a source of heterogeneity, but experimental design was not.

conclusionsHeparin may reduce 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis, at the same time, there was no increase in the risk of bleeding in the heparin group. We recommend the use of heparin for sepsis and severe sepsis.

Indexed as

AdultAnticoagulantsHeparinHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisAnticoagulantsHeparin

Identifiers

PMID25318353
PMCPMC4213495
OpenAlexW2138521152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.