Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25317537›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2014

Application of F-18-sodium fluoride (NaF) dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for defect healing: a comparison of biomaterials in an experimental osteoporotic rat model.

Caixia Cheng, Volker Alt, Leyun Pan, Ulrich Thormann, Reinhard Schnettler, Ludwig G Strauss, Sascha Heinemann, Matthias Schumacher, Michael Gelinsky, Berthold Nies and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bone & joint research · 2017
    Article
  6. Quantitative imaging methods in osteoporosis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Journal of tissue engineering
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caixia ChengClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Volker AltDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany.
Leyun PanClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulrich ThormannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany.
Reinhard SchnettlerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany.
Ludwig G StraussClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sascha HeinemannMax-Bergmann-Center of Biomaterials, Institute of Materials Science, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Matthias SchumacherTechnische Universität Dresden, Centre for Translational Bone, Joint and Soft Tissue Research, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Michael GelinskyTechnische Universität Dresden, Centre for Translational Bone, Joint and Soft Tissue Research, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Berthold NiesInnoTERE GmbH, Radebeul, Germany.
Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-StraussClinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center, heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the current study was to measure and compare the effect of various biomaterials for the healing of osteoporotic bone defects in the rat femur using 18F-sodium fluoride dPET-CT. MATERIAL AND

methodsOsteoporosis was induced by ovariectomy and a calcium-restricted diet. After 3 months, rats were operated on to create a 4-mm wedge-shaped defect in the distal metaphyseal femur. Bone substitution materials of calcium phosphate cement (CPC), composites of collagen and silica, and iron foams with interconnecting pores were inserted. Strontium or bisphosphonate, which are well known for having positive effects in osteoporosis treatment, were added into the materials. Eighteen weeks after osteoporosis induction and 6 weeks following femoral surgery, dPET-CT studies scan were performed with 18F-Sodium Fluoride. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) and a 2-tissue compartmental learning-machine model (K1-k4, vessel density [VB], influx [ki]) were used for quantitative analysis.

resultsk3, reflecting the formation of fluoroapatite, revealed a statistically significant increase at the biomaterial-bone interface due to the Sr release from strontium-modified calcium phosphate cement (SrCPC) compared to CPC, which demonstrated enhanced new bone formation. In addition, k3 as measured in the porous scaffold silica/collagen xerogel (Sc-B30), showed a significant increase based on Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p<0.05) as compared with monolithic silica/collagen xerogel (B30) in the defect region. Furthermore, ki, reflecting the net plasma clearance of tracer to bone mineral measured in the iron foam with coating of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (Fe-BP), was enhanced as compared with plain iron foam (Fe) in the defect region.

conclusionsk3 was the most significant parameter for the characterization of healing processes and revealed the best differentiation between the 2 different biomaterials. PET scanning using 18F-sodium fluoride seems to be a sensitive and useful method for evaluation of bone healing after replacement with these biomaterials.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMultimodal ImagingOsteoporosisPositron-Emission TomographyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySodium FluorideTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiocompatible MaterialsSodium Fluoride

Identifiers

PMID25317537
PMCPMC4210358
OpenAlexW2144850922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.