Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25317107›Full record

ReviewGenomics & informatics2014

Transposable elements and genome size variations in plants.

Sung-Il Lee, Nam-Soo Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genomics & informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Multilevel genomic constraints shape nuclear tRNA gene organization in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Nuclear genome profiling of two species ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genome-wide characterization of theFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sung-Il LeeDepartment of Molecular Bioscience, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea.
Nam-Soo KimDepartment of Molecular Bioscience, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea.
Kangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-specific in plant taxonomy. Transposable element fractions in plant genomes are also variable, as low as ~3% in small genomes and as high as ~85% in large genomes, indicating that genome size is a linear function of transposable element content. Of the 2 classes of transposable elements, the dynamics of class 1 long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons is a major contributor to the 1C value differences among plants. The activity of LTR retrotransposons is under the control of epigenetic suppressing mechanisms. Also, genome-purging mechanisms have been adopted to counter-balance the genome size amplification. With a wealth of information on whole-genome sequences in plant genomes, it was revealed that several genome-purging mechanisms have been employed, depending on plant taxa. Two genera, Lilium and Fritillaria, are known to have large genomes in angiosperms. There were twice times of concerted genome size evolutions in the family Liliaceae during the divergence of the current genera in Liliaceae. In addition to the LTR retrotransposons, non-LTR retrotransposons and satellite DNAs contributed to the huge genomes in the two genera by possible failure of genome counter-balancing mechanisms.

Indexed as

C-valueDNA transposable elementsgenome-purginggenome sizeLTR retrotransposons

Identifiers

PMID25317107
PMCPMC4196380
OpenAlexW2062836337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.