Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25316935›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2014

Nonmedical use of sedatives in urban Bengaluru.

Prasanthi Nattala, Pratima Murthy, K Thennarasu, Linda B Cottler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prasanthi NattalaDepartment of Nursing, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pratima MurthyDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
K ThennarasuDepartment of Biostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Linda B CottlerDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Florida, USA.

Funding

International Research Training in Clinical SciencesD43TW005811 · FIC · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COTTLER, LINDA B. · 2001 to 2010
$1.8M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW005811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonmedical sedative use is emerging as a serious problem in India. However, there is paucity of literature on the patterns of use in the population.

aimThe aim of the present analysis was to explore sedative use patterns in an urban metropolis. MATERIALS AND

methodsData for the present analysis come from the parent study on nonmedical prescription drug use in Bengaluru, India. Participants (n = 717) were recruited using a mall-intercept approach, wherein they were intercepted in five randomly selected shopping malls, and administered an interview on their use of prescription drugs.

resultsPast 12-month nonmedical sedative use was reported by 12%, benzodiazepines being the commonest. Reasons cited for nonmedical use included "sleeplessness, pain relief, stress." A majority (73%) reported sedative use "in ways other than as prescribed," compared to "use without prescription" (27%). All prescriptions were issued by general physicians in private hospitals. About 11% among those who used "in ways other than as prescribed," and 100% of nonprescribed users, reported irregular use (skipping doses/stopping/restarting). Among those who used "in ways other than prescribed," pharmacy stores were the source of obtaining the sedatives. Among "nonprescribed users," family/friends were the main source. Three-percent reported using sedatives and alcohol together in the same use episode. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, nonmedical sedative use was significantly associated with graduation-level education or above (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-4.91), and married status (aOR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.04-5.18).

conclusionsFindings underscore the need for considering various contextual factors in tailoring preventive interventions for reducing nonmedical sedative use.

Indexed as

Nonmedical sedative useprescription drug misusesedative abusesedative misuse

Identifiers

PMID25316935
PMCPMC4181179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.