Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25316747›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2014

How infectious disease outbreaks affect community-based primary care physicians: comparing the SARS and H1N1 epidemics.

R Liisa Jaakkimainen, Susan J Bondy, Meredith Parkovnick, Jan Barnsley

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R Liisa JaakkimainenAssociate Professor in, and holds a Clinician Investigator award from, the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario. liisa.jaakkimainen@ices.on.ca.
Susan J BondyAssociate Professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto.
Meredith ParkovnickResearch assistant with the Primary Care Research Unit in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto.
Jan BarnsleyAssociate Professor at the Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto.
Institute for Work & Health · CAPublic Health Ontario · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare how the infectious disease outbreaks H1N1 and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) affected community-based GPs and FPs.

designA mailed survey sent after the H1N1 outbreak compared with the results of similar survey completed after the SARS outbreak.

settingGreater Toronto area in Ontario.

participantsA total of 183 randomly selected GPs and FPs who provided office-based care.

main outcome measuresThe perceptions of GPs and FPs on how serious infectious disease outbreaks affected their clinical work and personal lives; their preparedness for a serious infectious disease outbreak; and the types of information they want to receive and the sources they wanted to receive information from during a serious infectious disease outbreak. The responses from this survey were compared with the responses of GPs and FPs in the greater Toronto area who completed a similar survey in 2003 after the SARS outbreak.

resultsAfter the H1N1 outbreak, GPs and FPs still had substantial concerns about the effects of serious infectious disease outbreaks on the health of their family members. Physicians made changes to various office practices in order to manage and deal with patients with serious infectious diseases. They expressed concerns about the effects of an infectious disease on the provision of health care services. Also, physicians wanted to quickly receive accurate information from the provincial government and their medical associations.

conclusionSerious community-based infectious diseases are a personal concern for GPs and FPs, and have considerable effects on their clinical practice. Further work examining the timely flow of relevant information through different health care sectors and government agencies still needs to be undertaken.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypePhysicians, Primary CareAdultData CollectionFamily PracticeFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedOntarioResidence CharacteristicsSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25316747
PMCPMC4196817
OpenAlexW2109878060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.