Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25316461›Full record

ReviewSaudi medical journal2014

Pertussis. A reemerging and an underreported infectious disease.

Muhammad A Syed, Noureen F Bana

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi medical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of Pertussis Underreporting in Italy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad A SyedDepartment of Microbiology, University of Haripur, Hattar Road, Haripur 22620, Pakistan. Tel. +92 995615394. E-mail. mirwah2000@yahoo.de.
Noureen F Bana
University of Haripur · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pertussis or whooping cough is a highly infectious, vaccine preventable disease. The incidence of the disease  has greatly been reduced since the introduction of the diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis vaccine. Pertussis resurgence has been observed in highly vaccinated populations of Western countries since 1990s. Poor vaccine quality, waning vaccine induced immunity, pathogen adaptation, and enhanced surveillance as well as advancements in diagnostic facilities are some of the reasons considered responsible for the increased reporting of pertussis cases. Pertussis may have been ignored and unnoticed due to its atypical manifestations in partially immunized population or people with waning immunity. We review the reports of pertussis resurgence from different countries and attempt to investigate reasons behind the reappearance of the disease. Pertussis is still an under reported disease and the available data from the developing countries is not a true picture of the story.  Therefore, developing countries need to improve their surveillance systems.

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingGlobal HealthAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineDisease OutbreaksHumansImmunization, SecondaryInfantPertussis VaccineWhooping CoughDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccinePertussis Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID25316461
PMCPMC4362115
OpenAlexW1651041382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.