ArticleJournal of telemedicine and telecare2014
An emergency department registration kiosk can increase HIV screening in high risk patients.
Article in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing HIV testing engagement through provision of home HIV self-testing kits for patients who decline testing in the emergency department: a pilot randomisation study.Sexually transmitted infections · 2019Trial
- Innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the U.S.: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2024Review
- Digital HPV education to increase vaccine uptake among low income women.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- COVID-19 and beyond: Lessons learned from emergency department HIV screening for population-based screening in healthcare settings.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021Article
- "Meet people where they are": a qualitative study of community barriers and facilitators to HIV testing and HIV self-testing among African Americans in urban and rural areas in North Carolina.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Utilization of integrated health kiosks: A systematic review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2020Review
- Barriers and facilitators of deploying health kiosk in Iran: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020Article
- Informed consent for opt-in HIV testing via tablet kiosk: an assessment of patient comprehension and acceptability.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2017Article
- Factors associated with patients who prefer HIV self-testing over health professional testing in an emergency department-based rapid HIV screening program.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2017Article
- Public Health Information Delivery in the Emergency Department: Analysis of a Kiosk-Based Program.The Journal of emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Evaluation of hidden HIV infections in an urban ED with a rapid HIV screening program.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Improvements in the continuum of HIV care in an inner-city emergency department.AIDS (London, England) · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the feasibility and the patient acceptability of integrating a kiosk into routine emergency department (ED) practice for offering HIV testing. The work was conducted in four phases: phase 1 was a baseline, in which external testing staff offered testing at the bedside; phase 2 was a pilot assessment of a prototype kiosk; phase 3 was a pilot implementation and phase 4 was the full implementation with automated login. Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of offering HIV tests, acceptance, completion and result reporting. During the study period, the number of ED patients and eligible patients for screening were similar in the three main phases. However, the number and proportion of patients offered testing of those eligible for screening increased significantly from phase 1 (32%) to phase 3 (37%) and phase 4 (40%). There were slightly higher prevalences of newly diagnosed HIV with kiosk versus bedside testing (phase 1, 0%; phase 3, 0.2%; phase 4, 0.5%). Compared to patients tested at the bedside, patients tested via the kiosk were significantly younger, more likely to be female, to be black, and to report high risk behaviours. ED-based HIV screening via a registration-based kiosk was feasible, yielded similar proportions of testing, and increased the proportion of engagement of higher-risk patients in testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.