Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25315974›Full record

ReviewNeurocritical care2014

Monitoring inflammation (including fever) in acute brain injury.

J Javier Provencio, Neeraj Badjatia, Participants in the International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Javier ProvencioCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, NC30, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA, provenj@ccf.org.
Neeraj Badjatia
Participants in the International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-013Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G1002277Medical Research Council G9439390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation is an important part of the normal physiologic response to acute brain injury (ABI). How inflammation is manifest determines if it augments or hinders the resolution of ABI. Monitoring body temperature, the cellular arm of the inflammatory cascade, and inflammatory proteins may help guide therapy. This summary will address the utility of inflammation monitoring in brain-injured adults. An electronic literature search was conducted for English language articles describing the testing, utility, and optimal methods to measure inflammation in ABI. Ninety-four articles were included in this review. Current evidence suggests that control of inflammation after ABI may hold promise for advances in good outcomes. However, our understanding of how much inflammation is good and how much is deleterious is not yet clear. Several important concepts emerge form our review. First, while continuous temperature monitoring of core body temperature is recommended, temperature pattern alone is not useful in distinguishing infectious from noninfectious fever. Second, when targeted temperature management is used, shivering should be monitored at least hourly. Finally, white blood cell levels and protein markers of inflammation may have a limited role in distinguishing infectious from noninfectious fever. Our understanding of optimal use of inflammation monitoring after ABI is limited currently but is an area of active investigation.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrain InjuriesCritical CareFeverHumansImmunity, CellularInflammationInflammation MediatorsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisShiveringBiomarkersInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID25315974
OpenAlexW1996499358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.