Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25315848›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2014

Interventions to cultivate physician empathy: a systematic review.

Zak Kelm, James Womer, Jennifer K Walter, Chris Feudtner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04287452 (Canine-Assisted ANxiety Reduction IN Emergency Care IV), which is not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04287452 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Canine-Assisted ANxiety Reduction IN Emergency Care IV (CANINE IV)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsAnxiety Acute, Chronic PainArmsControl, Dog Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 395 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Effects of contact-based, short-term anti-stigma training for medical students : Results from a randomized controlled trial.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2020
    Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zak Kelm
James Womer
Jennifer K Walter
Chris FeudtnerDepartment of Medical Ethics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. feudtner@email.chop.edu.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USOhio University · USTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician empathy is both theoretically and empirically critical to patient health, but research indicates that empathy declines throughout medical school and is lower than ideal among physicians. In this paper, we synthesize the published literature regarding interventions that were quantitatively evaluated to detect changes in empathy among medical students, residents, fellows and physicians.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and PsychINFO in June of 2014 to identify articles that quantitatively assessed changes in empathy due to interventions among medical students, residents, fellows and physicians.

resultsOf the 1,415 articles identified, 64 met inclusion criteria. We qualitatively synthesized the findings of qualified studies by extracting data for ten study metrics: 1) source population, 2) sample size, 3) control group, 4) random assignment, 5) intervention type, 6) intervention duration, 7) assessment strategy, 8) type of outcome measure, 9) outcome assessment time frame, and 10) whether a statistically significant increase in empathy was reported. Overall, the 64 included studies were characterized by relatively poor research designs, insufficient reporting of intervention procedures, low incidence of patient-report empathy assessment measures, and inadequate evaluations of long-term efficacy. 8 of 10 studies with highly rigorous designs, however, found that targeted interventions did increase empathy.

conclusionsPhysician empathy appears to be an important aspect of patient and physician well-being. Although the current empathy intervention literature is limited by a variety of methodological weaknesses, a sample of high-quality study designs provides initial support for the notion that physician empathy can be enhanced through interventions. Future research should strive to increase the sample of high-quality designs through more randomized, controlled studies with valid measures, explicit reporting of intervention strategies and procedures, and long-term efficacy assessments.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalEmpathyPhysician-Patient RelationsCurriculumHumansInternship and ResidencyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID25315848
PMCPMC4201694
OpenAlexW2132916784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.