Trial reportJournal of health communication2014
Development and validation of the assessment of health literacy in breast and cervical cancer screening.
Trial report in Journal of health communication, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03726619 (e-CHEC-uP), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
e-CHEC-uP: Scaling up an Efficacious Cancer Screening Intervention for Women With Limited English
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2023Pooled it
- Definitions and measurement of health literacy in health and medicine research: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Understanding the Pap Testing Behaviors of African Immigrant Women in Developed Countries: A Systematic Review.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2021Pooled it
- Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Community-based health literacy focused intervention for cervical cancer control among Black women living with human immunodeficiency virus: A randomized pilot trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Trial
- A Descriptive Analysis of Cancer Screening Health Literacy Among Black Women Living with HIV in Baltimore, Maryland.Health literacy research and practice · 2022Trial
- Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale Time Duration of Self-Completion Versus Assisted Completion in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Comparison.The oncologist · 2021Trial
- Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Literacy Among Korean American Women: A Community Health Worker-Led Intervention.American journal of public health · 2017Trial
- Developing and Validating a Breast Cancer Screening Health Literacy Questionnaire Guided by Sørensen's Integrated Model for Malaysian Adults.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2026Article
- Development of the Swahili Cancer Health Literacy Test for use in the African context.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Developing and Validating the Health Literacy Scale for Migrant Workers: Instrument Development and Validation Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- A Moderating Role of Gender in Online Health Information Seeking Behaviors for Colorectal Cancer Knowledge among Korean Americans Aged 50 to 75 Years.Journal Of Human Behavior In The Social Environment · 2024Article
- Factors associated with HPV vaccination decision-making among Korean American women.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- The Chinese Version of the Breast Cancer Literacy Assessment Tool: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Cancer Screening Program Delivered by Community Health Workers for Chinese Married Immigrant Women in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- [Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Assessment of Health Literacy in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening].Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2021Article
- Exploring Health Literacy and the Correlates of Pap Testing Among African Immigrant Women: Findings from the AfroPap Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
For many people limited health literacy is a major barrier to effective preventive health behavior such as cancer screening, yet a comprehensive health literacy measure that is specific to breast and cervical cancer screening is not readily available. The purpose of this article is to describe the development and testing of a new instrument to measure health literacy in the context of breast and cervical cancer screening, the Assessment of Health Literacy in Cancer Screening (AHL-C). The AHL-C is based on Baker's conceptualization of health literacy and modeled from the two most popular health literacy tests, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine and the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. The AHL-C consists of four subscales; print literacy, numeracy, comprehension, and familiarity. We used baseline data from 560 Korean American immigrant women who participated in a community-based randomized trial designed to test the effect of a health literacy-focused intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening. Rigorous psychometric testing supports that the AHL-C is reliable, valid, and significantly correlated with theoretically selected variables. Future research is needed to test the utility of the AHL-C in predicting cancer screening outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.