ArticleScientific reports2014
A new approach for highly accurate, remote temperature probing using magnetic nanoparticles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fundamentals and Applications of Dual-Frequency Magnetic Particle Spectroscopy: Review for Biomedicine and Materials Characterization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- A High-Precision Real-Time Temperature Acquisition Method Based on Magnetic Nanoparticles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Critical Review on the Junction Temperature Measurement of Light Emitting Diodes.Micromachines · 2022Review
- A Temperature Imaging Method for Multi-Chip High Power LEDs Based on the Magnetic Nanoparticle Thermometer.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Engineering Gold Shelled Nanomagnets for Pre-Setting the Operating Temperature for Magnetic Hyperthermia.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- AC magnetometry with active stabilization and harmonic suppression for magnetic nanoparticle spectroscopy and thermometry.Journal of applied physics · 2020Article
- Spatial and Temperature Resolutions of Magnetic Nanoparticle Temperature Imaging with a Scanning Magnetic Particle Spectrometer.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Magnetic properties of individual CoScientific reports · 2017Article
- Magnetic nanoparticle thermometer: an investigation of minimum error transmission path and AC bias error.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we report on a new approach for remote temperature probing that provides accuracy as good as 0.017°C (0.0055% accuracy) by measuring the magnetisation curve of magnetic nanoparticles. We included here the theoretical model construction and the inverse calculation method, and explored the impact caused by the temperature dependence of the saturation magnetisation and the applied magnetic field range. The reported results are of great significance in the establishment of safer protocols for the hyperthermia therapy and for the thermal assisted drug delivery technology. Likewise, our approach potentially impacts basic science as it provides a robust thermodynamic tool for noninvasive investigation of cell metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.