Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25315444›Full record

ArticleBiometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine2014

Revised model of calcium and magnesium binding to the bacterial cell wall.

Kieth J Thomas, Charles V Rice

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sodium ion stress accelerates cell lysis inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ARNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bacteria Under Metal Stress-Molecular Mechanisms of Metal Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. An energy coupling factor transporter ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kieth J ThomasDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Stephenson Life Sciences Research Center, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Charles V Rice
University of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Metal Binding to the Bacterial Cell WallR01GM090064 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI RICE, CHARLES V · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM090064-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metals bind to the bacterial cell wall, yet the binding mechanisms and affinity constants are not fully understood. The cell wall of gram positive bacteria is characterized by a thick layer of peptidoglycan and anionic teichoic acids anchored in the cytoplasmic membrane as lipoteichoic acid or covalently bound to the cell wall as wall teichoic acid. The polyphosphate groups of teichoic acid provide one-half of the metal binding sites for calcium and magnesium, which contradicts previous reports that calcium binding is 100 % dependent on teichoic acid. The remaining binding sites are formed with the carboxyl units of peptidoglycan. In this work we report equilibrium association constants and total metal binding capacities for the interaction of calcium and magnesium ions with the bacterial cell wall. Metal binding is much stronger than previously reported. Curvature of Scatchard plots from the binding data and the resulting two regions of binding affinity suggest the presence of negative cooperative binding, which means that the binding affinity decreases as more ions become bound to the sample. For Ca(2+), Region I has a KA = (1.0 ± 0.2) × 10(6) M(-1) and Region II has a KA = (0.075 ± 0.058) × 10(6) M(-1). For Mg(2+), KA1 = (1.5 ± 0.1) × 10(6) and KA2 = (0.17 ± 0.10) × 10(6). A binding capacity (η) is reported for both regions. However, since binding is still occurring in Region II, the total binding capacity is denoted by η2, which are 0.70 ± 0.04 and 0.67 ± 0.03 µmol/mg for Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) respectively. These data contradict the current paradigm of only a single metal affinity value that is constant over a range of concentrations. We also find that measurement of equilibrium binding constants is highly sample dependent. This suggests a role for diffusion of metals through heterogeneous cell wall fragments. As a result, we are able to reconcile many contradictory theories that describe binding affinity and the binding mode of divalent metal cations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBacillus subtilisCalciumCell WallKineticsMagnesiumPeptidoglycanCalciumMagnesiumPeptidoglycan

Identifiers

PMID25315444
PMCPMC4299761
OpenAlexW2048939710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.