ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2014
[Clinical evidence for metabolic surgery].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Metabolic surgery or conservative measures as therapy of obese type 2 diabetics?]Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The metabolic effect of bariatric surgery is well-established and is considered to be self-evident in morbidly obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m(2). Metabolic surgery performed on patients with obesity grades II (BMI 35-40 kg/m(2)) and I (BMI 30-35 kg/m(2)) according to the World Health Organization (WHO) has increased in recent years; however, the indications for metabolic surgery in obesity grades I and II are currently under debate due to insufficient evidence. In the last 5 years several highly qualified randomized clinical trials have been published which evaluated the effect of metabolic surgery in patients with obesity grades I and II in comparison to conservative therapy. Based on these data the efficacy of metabolic surgery in short-term follow-up (12-36 months) is unquestionable when compared to conservative therapy according to the current guidelines. Besides improved glycemic control and remission of diabetes, metabolic surgery has the potential to have a positive influence on diabetic complications, such as diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy and polyneuropathy, as well as on comorbidities, such as arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia. Future clinical trials should address the long-term (> 36 months) effects of metabolic surgery, patient selection criteria and choice of procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.