Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25315270›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2014

Histone core modifications regulating nucleosome structure and dynamics.

Peter Tessarz, Tony Kouzarides

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 533 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
533citing papers in PubMed
35.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

533 citing papers in PubMed, 1,008 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond DNA damage: 3D tumor models and the integrin mechanobiology of radioresistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

473 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Peter TessarzGurdon Institute and Department of Pathology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK; and the Max Planck Research Group 'Chromatin and Ageing', Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 9b, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
Tony KouzaridesGurdon Institute and Department of Pathology, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK.
Wellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K017438/1Cancer Research UK 10827Cancer Research UK 17001Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-translational modifications of histones regulate all DNA-templated processes, including replication, transcription and repair. These modifications function as platforms for the recruitment of specific effector proteins, such as transcriptional regulators or chromatin remodellers. Recent data suggest that histone modifications also have a direct effect on nucleosomal architecture. Acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation and citrullination of the histone core may influence chromatin structure by affecting histone-histone and histone-DNA interactions, as well as the binding of histones to chaperones.

Indexed as

DNA RepairProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAcetylationCitrullineDNADNA ReplicationHistonesHumansMethylationMolecular ChaperonesNucleosomesPhosphorylationTranscription, GeneticCitrullineDNAHistonesMolecular ChaperonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID25315270
OpenAlexW2094998522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.