Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25314898›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2014

Motor contributions to the temporal precision of auditory attention.

Benjamin Morillon, Charles E Schroeder, Valentin Wyart

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rhythmic oscillations of visual contrast sensitivity synchronized with action.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Cortico-striatal network architecture shapes rhythmic biases in music.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  5. Sensory integration, temporal prediction, and rule discovery reflect interdependent inference processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Musical neurodynamics.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Benjamin MorillonDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Charles E Schroeder1] Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032, USA [2] Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia Program, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York 10962, USA.
Valentin WyartDépartement d'Etudes Cognitives, Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Inserm unit 960, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris 75005, France.

Funding

PHYSIOLOGY OF VISUAL DYSFUNCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH060358 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2000 to 2013
$4.0M
Neurophysiology and Anatomy of Multisensory ProcessingR01DC011490 · NIDCD · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI HACKETT, TROY A., SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC011490NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011490NIMH NIH HHS MH060358NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In temporal-or dynamic-attending theory, it is proposed that motor activity helps to synchronize temporal fluctuations of attention with the timing of events in a task-relevant stream, thus facilitating sensory selection. Here we develop a mechanistic behavioural account for this theory by asking human participants to track a slow reference beat, by noiseless finger pressing, while extracting auditory target tones delivered on-beat and interleaved with distractors. We find that overt rhythmic motor activity improves the segmentation of auditory information by enhancing sensitivity to target tones while actively suppressing distractor tones. This effect is triggered by cyclic fluctuations in sensory gain locked to individual motor acts, scales parametrically with the temporal predictability of sensory events and depends on the temporal alignment between motor and attention fluctuations. Together, these findings reveal how top-down influences associated with a rhythmic motor routine sharpen sensory representations, enacting auditory 'active sensing'.

Indexed as

HearingMotor ActivityAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSoundYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25314898
PMCPMC4199392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.