Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25314276›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A role for neuropilins in the interaction between Schwann cells and meningeal cells.

Kasper C D Roet, Kerstin T S Wirz, Elske H P Franssen, Joost Verhaagen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kasper C D RoetLaboratory for Neuroregeneration, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of The Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kerstin T S WirzLaboratory for Neuroregeneration, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of The Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elske H P FranssenLaboratory for Neuroregeneration, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of The Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost VerhaagenLaboratory for Neuroregeneration, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an Institute of The Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognition Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLRoyal Academy of Art · NLRoyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In their natural habitat, the peripheral nerve, Schwann cells (SCs) form nicely aligned pathways (also known as the bands of Büngner) that guide regenerating axons to their targets. Schwann cells that are implanted in the lesioned spinal cord fail to align in pathways that could support axon growth but form cellular clusters that exhibit only limited intermingling with the astrocytes and meningeal cells (MCs) that are present in the neural scar. The formation of cell clusters can be studied in co-cultures of SCs and MCs. In these co-cultures SCs form cluster-like non-overlapping cell aggregates with well-defined boundaries. There are several indications that neuropilins (NRPs) play an important role in MC-induced SC aggregation. Both SCs and MCs express NRP1 and NRP2 and SCs express the NRP ligands Sema3B, C and E while MCs express Sema3A, C, E and F. We now demonstrate that in SC-MC co-cultures, siRNA mediated knockdown of NRP2 in SCs decreased the formation of SC clusters while these SCs maintained their capacity to align in bands of Büngner-like columnar arrays. Unexpectedly, knockdown of NRP1 expression resulted in a significant increase in SC aggregation. These results suggest that a reduction in NRP2 expression may enhance the capacity of implanted SCs to interact with MCs that invade a neural scar formed after a lesion of the spinal cord.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesFemaleMeningesNeuropilin-1Neuropilin-2RatsRats, Inbred F344RNA InterferenceRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingSchwann CellsTransfectionNeuropilin-1Neuropilin-2RNA, MessengerRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID25314276
PMCPMC4196904
OpenAlexW2093071157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.