SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2014
Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes.
Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 216 citations in OpenAlex.
- A concept analysis of transitional care for people with cancer.Nursing open · 2024Pooled it
- Use and impact of breast cancer survivorship care plans: a systematic review.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of treatment summaries for cancer survivors: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020Pooled it
- Survivorship Care Plans in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Care Plan Outcomes.The oncologist · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic Review of the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans on Health Outcomes and Health Care Delivery.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Pooled it
- The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016Pooled it
- Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016Pooled it
- American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansGuideline
- Experiences of adult survivors of childhood cancer in a randomized cardiovascular health promotion trial: a qualitative report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Trial
- Effectiveness of the socioecological informed contextual treatment summary and care plan (TSSCP-P, Brazil) for breast cancer survivors: a randomized, controlled study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Trial
- A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate a survivorship care planning intervention for head and neck cancer survivor-caregiver dyads.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Trial
- Feasibility of delivering survivorship care via lay health educators: A pilot randomized controlled trial among rural cancer survivors.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023Trial
- Cancer survivorship care for young adults: a risk-stratified, multicenter randomized controlled trial to improve symptoms.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Acceptability and feasibility of survivorship care plans and an accompanying mobile health intervention for adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2021Trial
- Randomized controlled trial of individualized treatment summary and survivorship care plans for hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors.Haematologica · 2019Trial
- Trial
- The unmet emotional, care/support, and informational needs of adult survivors of pediatric malignancies.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016Trial
- Feasibility, acceptance and long-term exercise behaviour in cancer patients: an exercise intervention by using a swinging-ring system.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2015Trial
- Catalyzing Navigation for Breast Cancer Survivorship (CaNBCS) in Safety-Net Settings: A Mixed Methods Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEight years after the Institute of Medicine recommended survivorship care plans (SCPs) for all cancer survivors, this study systematically reviewed the evidence for their use.
methodsStudies evaluating outcomes after implementation of SCPs for cancer survivors were identified by searching databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane). Data were extracted and summarised.
resultsTen prospective studies (2286 survivors) met inclusion criteria (5 randomised controlled trials (RCTs)). Study populations included survivors of breast, gynaecological, colorectal and childhood cancer. Several models of SCP were evaluated (paper based/on-line, oncologist/nurse/primary-care physician-delivered and different templates). No significant effect of SCPs was found on survivor distress, satisfaction with care, cancer-care coordination or oncological outcomes in RCTs. Breast cancer survivors with SCPs were better able to correctly identify the clinician responsible for their follow-up care. One study suggested a positive impact on reducing unmet needs. Levels of survivor satisfaction with, and self-reported understanding of, their SCP were very high. Feasibility was raised by health professionals as a significant barrier, as SCPs took 1-4 h of their time to develop.
conclusionsEmerging evidence shows very few measurable benefits of SCPs. Survivors reported high levels of satisfaction with SCPs. Resource issues were identified as a significant barrier to implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.