Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25314064›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Differential response of head and neck cancer cell lines to TRAIL or Smac mimetics is associated with the cellular levels and activity of caspase-8 and caspase-10.

N Raulf, R El-Attar, D Kulms, D Lecis, D Delia, H Walczak, K Papenfuss, E Odell, M Tavassoli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Dual Antagonist of cIAP/XIAP ASTX660 Sensitizes HPVClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Targeting the BIR Domains of Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) Proteins in Cancer Treatment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Therapeutic Small Molecules Target Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins in Cancers with Deregulation of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cell Death Pathways.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 2-DG-Regulated RIP and c-FLIP Effect on Liver Cancer Cell Apoptosis Induced by TRAIL.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Protective effect of RIP and c-FLIP in preventing liver cancer cell apoptosis induced by TRAIL.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

N RaulfDepartment of Molecular Oncology, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Hodgkin Building, London SE1 1UL, UK.
R El-AttarDepartment of Molecular Oncology, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Hodgkin Building, London SE1 1UL, UK.
D KulmsExperimental Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, TU-Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
D LecisDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133 Milano, Italy.
D DeliaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133 Milano, Italy.
H WalczakCentre for Cell Death, Cancer and Inflammation (CCCI) UCL Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
K PapenfussCentre for Cell Death, Cancer and Inflammation (CCCI) UCL Cancer Institute, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
E OdellDepartment of Molecular Oncology, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Hodgkin Building, London SE1 1UL, UK.
M TavassoliDepartment of Molecular Oncology, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Hodgkin Building, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITGuy's Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent treatment strategies for head and neck cancer are associated with significant morbidity and up to 50% of patients relapse, highlighting the need for more specific and effective therapeutics. Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and Smac mimetics (SMs) are promising anticancer agents, but their effect on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unknown.

methodsWe examined the response of a panel of nine HNSCC cell lines to TRAIL and SMs and investigated the mechanism of cell type-specific response by functional analysis.

resultsHead and neck cancer cell lines revealed a converse response pattern with three cell lines being highly sensitive to Smac-164 (SM) but resistant to TRAIL, whereas the other six were sensitive to TRAIL but resistant to SM. Distinct protein expression and activation patterns were found to be associated with susceptibility of HNSCC cell lines to TRAIL and SM. Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand sensitivity was associated with high caspase-8 and Bid protein levels, and TRAIL-sensitive cell lines were killed via the type II extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Smac mimetic-sensitive cells expressed low levels of caspase-8 and Bid but had high TNF-α expression. Smac mimetic-induced cell death was associated with caspase-10 activation, suggesting that in the absence of caspase-8, caspase-10 mediates response to SM. Cotreatment with TNF-α sensitised the resistant cells to SM, demonstrating a decisive role for TNF-α-driven feedback loop in SM sensitivity.

conclusionsTumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and SMs effectively kill HNSCC cell lines and therefore represent potential targeted therapeutics for head and neck cancer. Distinct molecular mechanisms determine the sensitivity to each agent, with levels of TNF-α, caspase-8, Bid and caspase-10 providing important predictive biomarkers of response to these agents.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBH3 Interacting Domain Death Agonist ProteinBiomimeticsBlotting, WesternBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCarcinoma, Squamous CellCaspase 10Caspase 8Cell ProliferationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansTNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTriazolesTumor Cells, CulturedTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaBH3 Interacting Domain Death Agonist ProteinBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCaspase 10Caspase 8SM 164TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing LigandTriazolesTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID25314064
PMCPMC4229641
OpenAlexW1982878364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.