Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25314063›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2014

α-Smooth muscle actin expression and desmoplastic stromal reaction in pancreatic cancer: results from the CONKO-001 study.

M Sinn, C Denkert, J K Striefler, U Pelzer, J M Stieler, M Bahra, P Lohneis, B Dörken, H Oettle, H Riess and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic biomarkers related to tumoral microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M SinnCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
C DenkertCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
J K StrieflerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
U PelzerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
J M StielerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
M BahraCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
P LohneisCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
B DörkenCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
H OettleCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
H RiessCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
B V SinnCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious investigations in pancreatic cancer suggest a prognostic role for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression and stromal density in the peritumoural stroma. The aim of this study was to further validate the impact of α-SMA expression and stromal density in resectable pancreatic cancer patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine compared with untreated patients.

methodsCONKO-001 was a prospective randomised phase III study investigating the role of adjuvant gemcitabine as compared with observation. Tissue samples of 162 patients were available for immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays to evaluate the impact of α-SMA expression and stromal density impact on patient outcome.

resultsHigh α-SMA expression in tumour stroma was associated with worse patient outcome (DFS: P=0.05, OS: P=0.047). A dense stroma reaction was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population (DFS: P=0.001, OS: P=0.001). This positive prognostic impact was restricted to patients with no adjuvant treatment (DFS: P<0.001, OS: P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, α-SMA and stromal density expression were independently predictive factors for survival.

conclusionsOur data confirm the negative prognostic impact of high α-SMA expression in pancreatic cancer patients after curatively intended resection. In contrast to former investigations, we found a positive prognostic impact for a dense stroma. This significant influence was restricted to patients who received no adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Tumor MicroenvironmentActinsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantDeoxycytidineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGemcitabineHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleACTA2 protein, humanActinsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorDeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID25314063
PMCPMC4229636
OpenAlexW2022334439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.