Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25314062›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Direct incorporation of the NKT-cell activator α-galactosylceramide into a recombinant Listeria monocytogenes improves breast cancer vaccine efficacy.

M Singh, W Quispe-Tintaya, D Chandra, A Jahangir, M M Venkataswamy, T W Ng, S Sharma-Kharkwal, L J Carreño, S A Porcelli, C Gravekamp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Microbiota in cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. HarnessingArchives of Razi Institute · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. EngineeringMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  16. Science translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

M SinghDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
W Quispe-TintayaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
D ChandraDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
A JahangirDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
M M VenkataswamyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
T W NgDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
S Sharma-KharkwalDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
L J Carreño1] Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA [2] Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Avenue Independencia #1027, Santiago 8380453, Chile.
S A PorcelliDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
C GravekampDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSORP30CA013330 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI THOMAS E ROHAN · 1985 to 2026
$111.2M
Immunology/Pathology CoreP30AI051519 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDSTEIN, HARRIS · 2003 to 2013
$18.6M
Precision Targeting of CD1-Restricted iNKT Cells for Cancer ImmunotherapyR01AI045889 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI Steven A Porcelli · 1999 to 2026
$9.3M
New Approaches to Prevent or Treat Breast Cancer MetastasesR21CA129470 · NCI · CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MED CTR RES INSTITUTE · PI GRAVEKAMP, CLAUDIA · 2008 to 2009
$414k
NCI NIH HHS 1R21 CA129470-01NCI NIH HHS CA013330NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013330NCI NIH HHS R21 CA129470NIAID NIH HHS AI-51519NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI051519NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045889NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI45889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune suppression in the tumour microenvironment remains a major limitation to successful immunotherapy of cancer. In the current study, we analysed whether the natural killer T cell-activating glycolipid α-galactosylceramide could overcome immune suppression and improve vaccination against metastatic breast cancer.

methodsMice with metastatic breast cancer (4T1 model) were therapeutically treated with a Listeria monocytogenes-based vaccine expressing tumour-associated antigen Mage-b followed by α-galactosylceramide as separate agents, or as a complex of α-galactosylceramide stably incorporated into Listeria-Mage-b. Effects on metastases, tumour weight, toxicity and immune responses were determined.

resultsSequential treatments of mice with established 4T1 breast carcinomas using Listeria-Mage-b followed by α-galactosylceramide as a separate agent was highly effective at reducing metastases, but was accompanied by severe liver toxicity. In contrast, combined therapy using Listeria-Mage-b modified by incorporation of α-galactosylceramide resulted in nearly complete elimination of metastases without toxicity. This was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of natural killer T cells in the spleen, and an increase in natural killer cell activity and in T cell responses to Mage-b.

conclusionsOur results suggest that direct incorporation of α-galactosylceramide into a live bacterial vaccine vector is a promising non-toxic new approach for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmApoptosisBlotting, WesternCancer VaccinesCell AdhesionCell CycleCell MovementCell ProliferationFemaleFlow CytometryGalactosylceramidesImmunoenzyme TechniquesKiller Cells, NaturalListeria monocytogenesalpha-galactosylceramideAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesGalactosylceramidesMageb1 protein, mouseNeoplasm ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25314062
PMCPMC4229631
OpenAlexW2058686139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.