Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25313658›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2015

The strength of gradually accruing probabilistic evidence modulates brain activity during a categorical decision.

Mark E Wheeler, Sarah G Woo, Tobin Ansel, Joshua J Tremel, Amanda L Collier, Katerina Velanova, Elisabeth J Ploran, Tianming Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergence of Categorical Representations in Parietal and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex across Extended Training.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brain Mechanisms of Concept Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark E WheelerUniversity of Pittsburgh.
Sarah G Woo
Tobin Ansel
Joshua J Tremel
Amanda L Collier
Katerina Velanova
Elisabeth J Ploran
Tianming Yang

Funding

Functional Imaging of Perceptual Decision Making and Evidence AccumulationR01MH086492 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHEELER, MARK EDWARD · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086492NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH086492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of neural activity during a perceptual decision is well characterized by the evidence parameter in sequential sampling models. However, it is not known whether accumulating signals in human neuroimaging are related to the integration of evidence. Our aim was to determine whether activity accumulates in a nonperceptual task by identifying brain regions tracking the strength of probabilistic evidence. fMRI was used to measure whole-brain activity as choices were informed by integrating a series of learned prior probabilities. Participants first learned the predictive relationship between a set of shape stimuli and one of two choices. During scanned testing, they made binary choices informed by the sum of the predictive strengths of individual shapes. Sequences of shapes adhered to three distinct rates of evidence (RoEs): rapid, gradual, and switch. We predicted that activity in regions informing the decision would modulate as a function of RoE prior to the choice. Activity in some regions, including premotor areas, changed as a function of RoE and response hand, indicating a role in forming an intention to respond. Regions in occipital, temporal, and parietal lobes modulated as a function of RoE only, suggesting a preresponse stage of evidence processing. In all of these regions, activity was greatest on rapid trials and least on switch trials, which is consistent with an accumulation-to-boundary account. In contrast, activity in a set of frontal and parietal regions was greatest on switch and least on rapid trials, which is consistent with an effort or time-on-task account.

Indexed as

Brain MappingProbabilityAdolescentAdultBrainDecision MakingFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationYoung AdultOxygen

Identifiers

PMID25313658
PMCPMC4344900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.