Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25313584›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2014

Comparison of auditory brainstem response in HIV-1 exposed and unexposed newborns and correlation with the maternal viral load and CD4+ cell counts.

Ayotunde James Fasunla, Babatunde Oluwatosin Ogunbosi, Georgina Njideka Odaibo, Onyekwere George Benjamin Nwaorgu, Babafemi Taiwo, David Olufemi Olaleye, Kikelomo Osinusi, Robert Leo Murphy, Isaac Folorunso Adewole, Olusegun Olusina Akinyinka

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hearing Assessment in HIV-Exposed-Uninfected Infants.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayotunde James FasunlaaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology bDepartment of Virology cDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology dDepartment of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria eMedical Education Partnership in Nigeria, Ibadan fPresident's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief - AIDS Prevention Initiative Nigeria (PEPFAR-APIN PLUS), Ibadan, Nigeria gCenter for Global Health, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Babatunde Oluwatosin Ogunbosi
Georgina Njideka Odaibo
Onyekwere George Benjamin Nwaorgu
Babafemi Taiwo
David Olufemi Olaleye
Kikelomo Osinusi
Robert Leo Murphy
Isaac Folorunso Adewole
Olusegun Olusina Akinyinka
AIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria · NGUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

Medical Education Partnership Initiative in NigeriaR24TW008878 · FIC · COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN · PI ADEWOLE, ISAAC F, OLALEYE, DAVID OLUFEMI · 2010 to 2015
$9.4M
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008878FIC NIH HHS R24TW008878PHS HHS U51HA02522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe effects of maternal HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy on hearing of HIV-exposed newborns in sub-Saharan Africa have not been investigated. We determined the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss among HIV-exposed newborns and the association between the hearing threshold and maternal and newborn parameters.

designA cohort audiometric study of newborns between October 2012 and April 2013. SETTINGS: A secondary and tertiary hospital-based study.

participantsConsecutive 126 HIV-exposed and 121 HIV-unexposed newborns.

interventionHearing screening of the newborns was done with Auditory Brainstem Response and compared with maternal HAART, CD4 cell counts, RNA viral loads and newborn CD4 cell count percentage.

main outcome measureHearing threshold levels of both groups were measured and analysed.

resultsAround 11.1% of HIV-exposed and 6.6% of unexposed newborns had hearing impairment (P = 0.2214). About 6.4% of HIV-exposed and 2.5% HIV-unexposed newborns had hearing threshold of more than 20 dBHL (P = 0.1578). There was no significant association between the hearing thresholds of HIV-exposed newborns and maternal CD4 cell counts (P = 0.059) but there was with maternal viral load (P = 0.034). There was significant difference between the hearing thresholds of HIV-exposed newborns with CD4% of 25 or less and more than 25. This study showed significant difference in the hearing of the 119 HAART-exposed newborns and seven unexposed newborns [P = 0.002; risk ratio, 0.13 (0.05-0.32)].

conclusionThere was a trend towards more hearing loss in HIV-exposed newborns. However, hearing thresholds increase with increasing mothers' viral load. The background information supports the need for further studies on the role of in-utero exposure to HIV and HAART in newborn hearing loss.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemMaternal-Fetal ExchangeViral LoadAfrica South of the SaharaAudiometryCD4 Lymphocyte CountCohort StudiesFemaleHearing LossHIV InfectionsHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID25313584
PMCPMC4197809
OpenAlexW2331975329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.